When to Remove the Indwelling Catheter After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy? CARESS (CAtheter REmoval after Sacrocolpopexy Surgery)

被引:3
|
作者
Aslam, Muhammad Faisal [1 ]
Bazzi, Ali A. [1 ]
Hagglund, Karen H. [1 ]
Osmundsen, Blake C. [2 ]
机构
[1] St John Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Legacy Hlth, Div Organol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Portland, OR USA
来源
关键词
catheter removal after sacrocolpopexy; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTIONS; FREE VAGINAL TAPE; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000826
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to determine the best practice guidelines regarding the use of indwelling catheters after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Methods Multicenter (3 sites) randomized control trial comparing the standard overnight indwelling urethral catheterization (group 2) with removal of catheter immediately after surgery (group 1). Our primary outcome is the need for recatheterization. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients discharged with a catheter, length of hospital stay, number of urinary tract infections, patient satisfaction/pain scores, and whether patients would use the same treatment again. Results There were 32 patients (43.8%) in group 1 and 41 patients (56.2%) in group 2. On average, patients in group 1 required straight catheterization 0.8 (SD = 0.9) times versus 0.6 (SD = 0.9) times for group 2 (P = 0.239). The number of days with a catheter between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. There was no statistical significance between group 1 and group 2 in terms of operative time, times to leave the operating room, and hospital. Zero patients in group 1 and 2 patients in group 2 had a urinary tract infection. After dividing the groups based on whether or not they underwent a transvaginal tape procedure, the final results were similar. Conclusions We did not observe a difference in the risk of recatheterization or discharge home with a urinary catheter between the 2 groups. Addition of transvaginal tape to sacrocolpopexy did not show a difference in the risk of recatheterization. One reason for the lack of difference between the 2 groups could be due to a lack of power in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 127
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy
    Catherine A. Matthews
    Erinn M. Myers
    Barbara R. Henley
    Kimberly Kenton
    Erica Weaver
    Jennifer M. Wu
    Elizabeth J. Geller
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2023, 34 : 291 - 296
  • [32] ASSESSING PROLAPSE RECURRENCE AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE SACROCOLPOPEXY: DOES MESH WEIGHT MATTER?
    Giugale, L. E.
    Hansbarger, M. M.
    Askew, A. L.
    Visco, A. G.
    Shepherd, J. P.
    Bradley, M. S.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 : S16 - S17
  • [33] Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Mueller, Margaret G.
    Jacobs, Kristin M.
    Mueller, Elizabeth R.
    Abernethy, Melinda G.
    Kenton, Kimberly S.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (04): : 267 - 271
  • [34] WHEN TO REMOVE THE PD CATHETER AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION? (RT)
    Pampa, Saul
    Rivera Gorrin, Maite
    Burguera, Victor
    Yerovi, Estefania
    Caravaca, Fernando
    Delgado, Maria
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 31 : 1510 - 1510
  • [35] Evaluation of early removal of indwelling urinary catheter (IDUC) after radical surgery in cervical cancer
    Castro, B. G.
    Mengatto, M. Fabro
    Vieira, M. A.
    Andrade, C. E. M. D. C.
    Cintra, G. F.
    Tsunoda, A. T.
    Schmidt, R.
    Reis, R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 279 - 279
  • [36] THE EFFECTS OF EARLY REMOVAL OF INDWELLING URINARY CATHETER AFTER RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
    CHAMBERLAIN, DH
    HOPKINS, MP
    ROBERTS, JA
    MCGUIRE, EJ
    MORLEY, GW
    WANG, CC
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 43 (02) : 98 - 102
  • [37] Recurrence of prolapse after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
    Das, D.
    Carroll, A.
    Mueller, M. G.
    Kenton, K.
    Lewicky-Gaupp, C.
    Collins, S. A.
    Geynisman-Tan, J.
    Bretschneider, C. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (03) : S1307 - S1308
  • [38] Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
    Das, Deepanjana
    Carroll, Allison
    Mueller, Margaret
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Collins, Sarah
    Geynisman-Tan, Julia
    Bretschneider, C. Emi
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (09) : 2507 - 2514
  • [39] Management of ileus or small bowel obstruction after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy; a multicenter case series
    Nguyen, H.
    Wong, J. W.
    Ramm, O.
    Geynisman-Tan, J.
    Bretschneider, C. E.
    Mueller, M. G.
    Collins, S. A.
    Lewicky-Gaupp, C.
    Brown, O.
    Kenton, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (03) : S888 - S888
  • [40] Patient experience with enhanced recovery and early discharge after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a qualitative study
    Evans, Sarah
    Snook, Lindsay
    Yates, Traci
    Bundy, Henry
    Abimbola, Obafunbi
    Myers, Erinn M.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (02) : 387 - 394