Randomised clinical trial: a novel rabeprazole extended release 50 mg formulation vs. esomeprazole 40 mg in healing of moderate-to-severe erosive oesophagitis - the results of two double-blind studies

被引:20
|
作者
Laine, L. [1 ]
Katz, P. O. [2 ]
Johnson, D. A. [3 ]
Ibegbu, I. [4 ]
Goldstein, M. J. [5 ]
Chou, C. [6 ]
Rossiter, G. [6 ]
Lu, Y. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Div Gastrointestinal & Liver Dis, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[4] Atlantic Med Grp, Jacksonville, NC USA
[5] Long Isl Gastrointestinal Res Grp, Great Neck, NY USA
[6] Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ USA
关键词
HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION; LANSOPRAZOLE; 30; MG; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS; ENDOSCOPIC ASSESSMENT; OMEPRAZOLE; PH; INTEROBSERVER; C-13-UREA; ACCURACY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04516.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
P>Background Current PPIs may not achieve desired outcomes in some GERD patients due to limited duration of acid inhibition. Aim To evaluate a novel rabeprazole extended release (ER), which provides longer duration of drug exposure and acid suppression, in healing and symptomatic resolution of moderate-severe erosive oesophagitis. Methods Patients with LA grade C or D oesophagitis were randomised to rabeprazole-ER 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg once daily in two identical 8-week double-blind trials (N = 2130). Two primary endpoints were tested sequentially: (1) healing by 8 weeks [hypothesis: rabeprazole-ER non-inferior to esomeprazole (non-inferiority margin = 8%)], (2) healing by 4 weeks [hypothesis: rabeprazole-ER superior to esomeprazole (P < 0.05)]. The secondary endpoint was sustained heartburn resolution at 4 weeks. Results Rabeprazole-ER was non-inferior to esomeprazole in week-8 healing (80.0% vs. 75.0%; 77.5% vs. 78.4%). Week-4 healing (54.8% vs. 50.3%; 50.9% vs. 50.7%) and sustained heartburn resolution (48.3% vs. 48.2%; 53.2% vs. 52.5%) were not significantly different. Post hoc combined results for grade D revealed rabeprazole-ER vs. esomeprazole differences in week-8 healing = 10.4% (95% CI: -1.4%, 22.2%) and week-4 healing = 12.0% (P = 0.048). Conclusions Rabeprazole-ER is as effective as esomeprazole in healing moderate-severe oesophagitis and achieves similar rates of heartburn resolution. Subgroup analysis suggests the possibility of benefit in severe oesophagitis, but this requires further evaluation (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00658528 and NCT00658775).
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 212
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] A phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of valdecoxib 40 mg vs. placebo in patients with multiple moderate or severe acute migraine headaches with or without aura
    Thomas, HM
    Kudrow, D
    Ashford, E
    Le, V
    Brown, M
    CEPHALALGIA, 2003, 23 (07) : 697 - 697
  • [22] Rofecoxib 50 mg and valdecoxib 20 or 40 mg in adults and adolescents with postoperative pain after third molar extraction: Results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose studies
    Daniels, Stephen E.
    Desjardins, Paul J.
    Bird, Steven R.
    Smugar, Steven S.
    Tershakovec, Andrew M.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 28 (07) : 1022 - 1034
  • [23] Randomized clinical trial: A double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 or 40 mg versus esomeprazole 40 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease and partial response to a healing dose of a proton-pump inhibitor
    Tack, Jan
    Vladimirov, Borislav
    Horny, Ivo
    Chong, Chui Fung
    Eisner, Jessica
    Czerniak, Richard
    Takanami, Yohei
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 35 (01):
  • [24] Once-Daily Oral Sarecycline 1.5 mg/kg/day Is Effective for Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris: Results from Two Identically Designed, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials
    Moore, Angela
    Green, Lawrence J.
    Bruce, Suzanne
    Sadick, Neil
    Tschen, Eduardo
    Werschler, Philip
    Cook-Bolden, Fran E.
    Dhawan, Sunil S.
    Forsha, Douglass
    Gold, Michael H.
    Guenthner, Scott
    Kempers, Steven E.
    Kircik, Leon H.
    Parish, Jennifer L.
    Rendon, Marta I.
    Rich, Phoebe
    Stein-Gold, Linda
    Tyring, Stephen K.
    Weiss, Robert A.
    Nasir, Adnan
    Schmitz, Carsten
    Boodhoo, Terry I.
    Kaoukhov, Alexandre
    Berk, David R.
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 17 (09) : 987 - 996
  • [25] Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre, phase III clinical trial with two stages to assess the safety and efficacy of letibotulinum toxin a vs. onabotulinum toxin a for subjects with moderate to severe crow's feet
    Yoo, K. H.
    Park, S. J.
    Han, H. S.
    Won, C. H.
    Lee, Y. W.
    Kim, B. J.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2021, 35 (07) : 1587 - 1594
  • [26] Evaluation of different inhaled combination therapies (EDICT):: a randomised, double-blind comparison of Seretide™ (50/250 μg bd Diskus™ vs. formoterol (12 μg bd) and budesonide (800 μg bd) given concurrently (both via Turbuhaler™) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma
    Ringdal, N
    Chuchalin, A
    Chovan, L
    Tudoric, N
    Maggi, E
    Whitehead, PJ
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 96 (11) : 851 - 861