Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:279
|
作者
Johnson, N [1 ]
Barlow, D
Lethaby, A
Tavender, E
Curr, L
Garry, R
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland Hosp, Natl Womens Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Cochrane Oral Hlth Grp, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Western Australia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 330卷 / 7506期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the most appropriate surgical method of hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) for women with benign disease. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, and Biological Abstracts. Selection of studies Only randomised controlled trials were selected; participants had to have benign gynaecological disease; interventions had to comprise at least one hysterectomy method compared with another; and trials had to report primary outcomes (time taken to return to normal activities, intraoperative visceral injury, and major long term complications) or secondary outcomes (operating time, other immediate complications of surgery, short term complications, and duration of hospital stay). Results 27 trials (total of 3643 participants) were included. Return to normal activities was quicker after vaginal than after abdominal hysterectomy (weighted mean difference 9.5 (95% confidence interval 6.4 to 12.6) days) and after laparoscopic than after abdominal hysterectomy (difference 13.6 (11.8 to 15.4)) days, but was not significantly different for laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy (difference -1.1 (-4.2 to 2.1) days). There were more urinary tract injuries with laparoscopic than with abdominal hysterectomy (odds ratio 2.61 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.60)), but no other intraoperative visceral injuries showed a significant difference between surgical approaches. Data were notably absent for many important long term patient outcome measures, where the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences, or they were simply not reported in trials. Conclusions Significantly speedier return to normal activities and other improved secondary outcomes (shorter duration of hospital stay and fewer unspecified infections or febrile episodes) suggest that vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy where possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy, although it brings a higher chance of bladder or ureter injury.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1481
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of honey after tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Lal, A.
    Chohan, K.
    Chohan, A.
    Chakravarti, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 42 (03) : 651 - 660
  • [22] Preoperative celecoxib in noncardiac surgery A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Khan, James S.
    Margarido, Clarita
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Clarke, Hance
    McLellan, Andrea
    Choi, Stephen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (03) : 204 - 214
  • [23] Electroacupuncture for Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Tan, Jiuqing
    Meng, Fangqi
    Zhang, Baobao
    Deng, Qingwen
    Jiao, Boyu
    Peng, Lizhi
    Ding, Ying
    Ruan, Jingwen
    Zeng, Jingchun
    Pei, Wenya
    Lin, Guohua
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [24] Antipsychotic medications for the treatment of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Kishi, Taro
    Hirota, Tomoya
    Matsunaga, Shinji
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 87 (07): : 767 - 774
  • [25] Prevention of groin injuries in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Esteve, E.
    Rathleff, M. S.
    Bagur-Calafat, C.
    Urrutia, G.
    Thorborg, K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (12) : 785 - 791
  • [26] Thiazolidinediones and risk of bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Azhari, H.
    Haig, C.
    Dawson, J.
    [J]. SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 63 (01) : 66 - 66
  • [27] Adverse events of exercise therapy in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niemeijer, Andre
    Lund, Hans
    Stafne, Signe Nilssen
    Ipsen, Thomas
    Goldschmidt, Cathrine Luhaaar
    Jorgensen, Claus Thomas
    Juhl, Carsten B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (18) : 1073 - 1080
  • [28] Effectiveness of acupuncture on anxiety disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Xiang-yun Yang
    Ning-bo Yang
    Fang-fang Huang
    Shuai Ren
    Zhan-jiang Li
    [J]. Annals of General Psychiatry, 20
  • [29] Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Noetel, Michael
    Sanders, Taren
    Gallardo-Gomez, Daniel
    Taylor, Paul
    Cruz, Borja del Pozo
    van den Hoek, Daniel
    Smith, Jordan J.
    Mahoney, John
    Spathis, Jemima
    Moresi, Mark
    Pagano, Rebecca
    Pagano, Lisa
    Vasconcellos, Roberta
    Arnott, Hugh
    Varley, Benjamin
    Parker, Philip
    Biddle, Stuart
    Lonsdale, Chris
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Aboulatta, Laila
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Aloud, Basma
    Askin, Nicole
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Shouman, Walid
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2022, 102 : 54 - 60