Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

被引:98
|
作者
Chen, Chia-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chung-Yao [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Hsieh-Ching [5 ]
Wu, Ching-Yi [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [7 ,8 ]
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [6 ]
Shen, I-Hsuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 5 Fu Hsing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Early Intervent, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Minimal clinically important difference; Psychometrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RELIABILITY; SPASTICITY; OUTCOMES; INTERRATER; CRITERIA; TOOLS; INDEX; TONE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05545-X
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a major problem in patients with stroke and influences their activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life. The Modified Ashworth Scale is widely used to assess spasticity. However, the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke have not been explored. AIM: This study aims to examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Longitudinal six-month follow-up study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards of a tertiary hospital. POPULATION: One-hundred and fifteen patients with stroke were recruited. METHODS: All patients underwent the assessment of Modified Ashworth Scale for the upper extremity (flexors of the elbow, wrist, and fingers) and the lower extremity (hip adductor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor) at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The average Modified Ashworth Scale scores of the upper and lower extremity muscles were obtained for analysis. Responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale was determined using standardized mean response, and the minimal clinically important differences were determined using a distribution-based approach with Effect Sizes of 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations. RESULTS: The responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the upper and lower extremity muscles was marked (standardized response mean = 0.89-1.09). The minimal clinically important differences of the average Modified Ashworth Scale of Effect Sizes 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations for the upper extremity muscles were 0.48 and 0.76, respectively, while those for the lower extremity muscles were 0.45 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Ashworth Scale was markedly responsive in detecting the changes in muscle tone in patients with stroke. The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study can be used by researchers and clinicians in determining whether the observed changes are clinically meaningful post-treatment or at follow-up. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study will enable clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in the muscle tone are true and clinically meaningful, and can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. Key words: stroke, muscle spasticity, minimal clinically important difference, psychometrics
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients
    Lauridsen, Henrik H.
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    Manniche, Claus
    Korsholm, Lars
    Grunnet-Nilsson, Niels
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2006, 7 (1)
  • [22] Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    Gatchel, Robert J.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Mayer, Tom G.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : 1739 - 1743
  • [23] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Currow, David C.
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (01) : 158 - 159
  • [24] A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke
    Chen, Hao-ling
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Hsieh, Yu-wei
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Liing, Rong-jiuan
    Chen, Chia-ling
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [25] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
    Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada, M.
    Bilbao, A.
    Ansola, L.
    Quirs, R.
    Garcia-Perez, L.
    Navarro, G.
    Escobar, A.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [26] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
    M. Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada
    A. Bilbao
    L. Ansola
    R. Quirós
    L. García-Perez
    G. Navarro
    A. Escobar
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17
  • [27] Responsiveness of the COPD Assessment Test The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Does Matter
    Kocks, Janwillem W. H.
    Tsiligianni, Ioanna G.
    van der Molen, Thys
    CHEST, 2012, 142 (01) : 267 - 268
  • [28] Evaluation of responsiveness and estimation of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores for the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale
    Gabes, Michaela
    Chamlin, Sarah L.
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    Cella, David
    Mancini, Anthony J.
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S164 - S164
  • [29] The minimal important difference for the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients in the subacute stage
    Lien, Hung-Pin
    Shieh, Yun-Jer
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Huang, Yi-Jing
    Wang, Inga
    Chen, Mei-Hsiang
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [30] Construct validity, responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire in individuals receiving stroke rehabilitation
    Wu, Sz-Yan
    Li, Yi-Chun
    Chen, Yu-Wen
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Pan, Hsiao-Chieh
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Lau, Hiu-Ying
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (25) : 6195 - 6203