Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound with artificial intelligence for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Ye, Xiao Hua [1 ]
Zhao, Lin Lin [2 ]
Wang, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Jinhua Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sch Med, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Digest Endoscopy Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; endoscopic ultrasound; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; meta-analysis; subepithelial lesions; SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; EUS;
D O I
10.1111/1751-2980.13110
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are thought to have a malignant potential. However, utilizing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to differentiate GISTs from other types of subepithelial lesions (SELs) remains challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostic systems for EUS have been reported to have a promising performance, although the results of the previous studies remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based EUS in distinguishing GISTs from other SELs. Methods A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify relevant articles. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of eligible studies were analyzed. Results Seven studies were eligible for the final analysis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of AI-based EUS were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.96) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.87), respectively. The overall diagnostic odds ratio of AI-based EUS for GISTs was 36.74 (95% CI 17.69-76.30) with an AUROC of 0.94. Conclusions AI-based EUS showed high diagnostic ability and might help better differentiate GISTs from other SELs. More prospective studies on the diagnosis of GISTs using AI-based EUS are warranted in clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in differentiating between gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A meta-analysis
    Tang, Jia Yue
    Tao, Ke Gong
    Zhang, Li Yuan
    Wu, Kai Ming
    Shi, Jian
    Zeng, Xin
    Lin, Yong
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2019, 20 (03) : 127 - 134
  • [42] Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Yosuke Minoda
    Eikichi Ihara
    Nao Fujimori
    Shuzaburo Nagatomo
    Mitsuru Esaki
    Yoshitaka Hata
    Xiaopeng Bai
    Yoshimasa Tanaka
    Haruei Ogino
    Takatoshi Chinen
    Qingjiang Hu
    Eiji Oki
    Hidetaka Yamamoto
    Yoshihiro Ogawa
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [43] Efficacy of ultrasound endoscopy with artificial intelligence for the differential diagnosis of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Minoda, Yosuke
    Ihara, Eikichi
    Fujimori, Nao
    Nagatomo, Shuzaburo
    Esaki, Mitsuru
    Hata, Yoshitaka
    Bai, Xiaopeng
    Tanaka, Yoshimasa
    Ogino, Haruei
    Chinen, Takatoshi
    Hu, Qingjiang
    Oki, Eiji
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Ogawa, Yoshihiro
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for transient tachypnea: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Yueqi
    Li, Na
    Qu, Yangming
    JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2022, 98 (04) : 329 - 337
  • [45] Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis
    Squizzato, Alessandro
    Rancan, Elena
    Dentali, Francesco
    Ageno, Walter
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2012, 130 : S126 - S126
  • [46] Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound for Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancers: A Meta-Analysis & Systematic Review
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Hagedorn, Curt
    Singh, Shailender
    Olyaee, Mojtaba
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB94 - AB94
  • [47] Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in detecting distal metastasis of esophageal cancers: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Reddy, Jyotsna Batapati Krishna
    Bechtold, Matthew L.
    Grewal, Ajitinder
    Bartalos, Christopher
    Bragg, Jack D.
    Ibdah, Jamal A.
    Antillon, Mainor R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 : S439 - S439
  • [48] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Artificial Intelligence Methods in Medical Imaging for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhan, Yuejuan
    Wang, Yuqi
    Zhang, Wendi
    Ying, Binwu
    Wang, Chengdi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [49] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiograph: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Siranart, Noppachai
    Deepan, Natee
    Techasatian, Witina
    Phutinart, Somkiat
    Sowalertrat, Walit
    Kaewkanha, Ponthakorn
    Pajareya, Patavee
    Tokavanich, Nithi
    Prasitlumkum, Narut
    Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [50] A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer histology identification and grading
    Morozov, Andrey
    Taratkin, Mark
    Bazarkin, Andrey
    Rivas, Juan Gomez
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Belenchon, Ines Rivero
    Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
    Shpikina, Anastasia
    Singla, Nirmish
    Teoh, Jeremy Y. C.
    Kozlov, Vasiliy
    Rodler, Severin
    Piazza, Pietro
    Fajkovic, Harun
    Yakimov, Maxim
    Abreu, Andre Luis E.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2023, 26 (04) : 681 - 692