Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production via gasification of vacuum residue and conventional reforming routes

被引:11
|
作者
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Khalafalla, Siddig S. [1 ]
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. [2 ]
Jamal, Aqil [2 ]
Ahmed, Usama [1 ,3 ]
Zahid, Umer [1 ,4 ]
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Aramco, Res & Dev Ctr, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hydrogen & Energy Stora, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Refining & Adv Chem, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
来源
关键词
Methanol; Carbon capture and utilization; Vacuum residue gasification; Economic analysis; Process simulation; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; FUEL-OIL; SIMULATION; CO2; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a cleaner and sustainable way. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert the dirty fossil fuels for the production of clean and environment friendly fuels in an economical manner. In this study, vacuum residue is employed as a feedstock to produce high grade methanol. A vacuum residue to methanol (VRTM) process is simulated using Aspen Plus for a methanol production capacity of 90 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The developed VRTM process is bench-marked with the conventional steam reforming to methanol (SRTM) process through energy, environmental and economic analysis. The performance of vacuum residue gasifier, natural gas reformer and the methanol synthesis reactor are validated against the plant data and the simulation results are found to be in good agreement. The results showed that the VRTM process offers a process energy efficiency of 49.5% which is 1.6% higher than the SRTM process. The unit cost of methanol product from the VRTM process is $ 317/tCH(3)OH which is 14% lower compared to the SRTM process. In terms of environmental analysis, SRTM process emits less carbon emissions than the VRTM process. However, the VRTM process offers a high purity captured CO2 stream that can be utilized for another application that can further offset the methanol production cost. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-liquids production based on gasification
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Platon, Alexandru
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    FUEL, 2010, 89 : S2 - S10
  • [32] Hydrogen production from woody biomass gasification: a techno-economic analysis
    Gubin, Veronica
    Benedikt, Florian
    Thelen, Ferdinand
    Hammerschmid, Martin
    Popov, Tom
    Hofbauer, Hermann
    Mueller, Stefan
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2024, 18 (04): : 818 - 836
  • [33] Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production from dehydrogenation and steam reforming of ethanol for carbon dioxide conversion to methanol
    Khamhaeng, P.
    Laosiripojana, N.
    Assabumrungrat, S.
    Kim-Lohsoontorn, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (60) : 30891 - 30902
  • [34] Techno-economic analysis of biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas via a supercritical methanol process
    Yusuf, N. N. A. N.
    Kamarudin, S. K.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 75 : 710 - 717
  • [35] Techno-Economic Evaluation of Solar Hybridized Biomass Gasification Polygeneration Plants
    Ngo, Nguyet Ky
    Smith, Toby
    Nathan, Graham
    Ashman, Peter
    Hosseini, Tara
    Beath, Andrew
    Stechel, Ellen B.
    Saw, Woei Lean
    Energy and Fuels, 2024, 38 (03): : 2058 - 2073
  • [36] Techno-Economic Evaluation of Solar Hybridized Biomass Gasification Polygeneration Plants
    Ngo, Nguyet Ky
    Smith, Toby
    Nathan, Graham
    Ashman, Peter
    Hosseini, Tara
    Beath, Andrew
    Stechel, Ellen B.
    Saw, Woei Lean
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 38 (03) : 2058 - 2073
  • [37] A comparative techno-economic assessment of biochar production from different residue streams using conventional and microwave pyrolysis
    Haeldermans, T.
    Campion, L.
    Kuppens, T.
    Vanreppelen, K.
    Cuypers, A.
    Schreurs, S.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 318
  • [38] Techno-economic evaluation of innovative steel production technologies
    Fischedick, Manfred
    Marzinkowski, Joachim
    Winzer, Petra
    Weigel, Max
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 84 : 563 - 580
  • [39] A Systematic Study on Techno-Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Production
    de Abreu, Victor Hugo Souza
    Pereira, Victoria Goncalves Ferreira
    Proenca, Lais Ferreira Crispino
    Toniolo, Fabio Souza
    Santos, Andrea Souza
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (18)
  • [40] Methanol fuel production from solar-assisted supercritical water gasification of algae: a techno-economic annual optimisation
    Rahbari, Alireza
    Shirazi, Alec
    Pye, John
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2021, 5 (19) : 4913 - 4931