The new resource politics: can Australia and South Africa accommodate China?

被引:11
|
作者
Beeson, Mark [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Soko, Mills [7 ]
Yong, Wang [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Murdoch Univ, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Univ York, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[7] Univ Cape Town, Grad Sch Business, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[8] Peking Univ, Sch Int Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Peking Univ, Ctr Int Polit Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
ENERGY SECURITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01041.x
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The material transformation of the Chinese economy is forcing a concomitant process of political adjustmentand not just in China. Other states are being forced to accommodate the rise of China. In this context, this article first presents a comparative analysis of China's impact on two countries, Australia and South Africa, which have little in common other than a wealth of natural resources and a possible status as middle powers; this is a particularly useful exercise because these states are geographically distant and have very different political structures and general developmental histories. Second, the authors consider how China's bilateral ties look from a Chinese perspective in these two very different relationships. Such an analysis serves as a reminder that resource dependency is a two-way street. The article argues that underlying material realities are constraining and to some extent determining the domestic and foreign policies of three very different states that otherwise have little in common.
引用
收藏
页码:1365 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条