Cultural ecosystem services in European grasslands: A systematic review of threats

被引:11
|
作者
Pellaton, Raoul [1 ]
Lellei-Kovacs, Eszter [1 ]
Baldi, Andras [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol & Bot, Lendulet Ecosyst Serv Res Grp, Alkotmany Ut 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Direct drivers; Nature conservation; Permanent grassland; Threat mitigation; Tourism; DRIVING FORCES; OUTDOOR RECREATION; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; VEGETATION; CONSERVATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-022-01755-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The degradation of ecosystems threatens the provision of ecosystem services and limits human well-being. This systematic literature review evaluates the threats surrounding cultural ecosystem services (CES), namely recreation and landscape aesthetics in European permanent grasslands. We identified underlying causes, direct threats, consequences and suggested solutions for threat mitigation. The most common threats were land-use and management change processes, followed by social attitude, industrial developments and natural threats. However, recreational activities also created negative feedback, affecting the ecosystem, biodiversity and CES, most frequently in the form of various touristic activities. Suggested solutions were most commonly socio-economic and institutional measures to enhance rural communities, as well as improving communication with relevant stakeholders. CES play a crucial role in reconnecting people with nature, and their consequent acknowledgement and incorporation into future ecosystem service frameworks and agri-environmental policy developments are key elements in supporting future sustainable grassland management.
引用
收藏
页码:2462 / 2477
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mapping lake ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Inacio, Miguel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 847
  • [22] A systematic quantitative review of coastal and marine cultural ecosystem services: Current status and future research
    Martin, Carol L.
    Momtaz, Salim
    Gaston, Troy
    Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 74 : 25 - 32
  • [23] Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review
    La Rosa, Daniele
    Spyra, Marcin
    Inostroza, Luis
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 74 - 89
  • [24] Cultural ecosystem services contribution on tourism in Anatolia: a review
    Tulek, Betul
    [J]. ANATOLIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (03): : 482 - 493
  • [25] Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance
    Simo Sarkki
    Andrej Ficko
    Karsten Grunewald
    Maria Nijnik
    [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16 : 2019 - 2032
  • [26] Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance
    Sarkki, Simo
    Ficko, Andrej
    Grunewald, Karsten
    Nijnik, Maria
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (07) : 2019 - 2032
  • [27] A systematic map of ecosystem services assessments around European agroforestry
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Torralba, Mario
    Burgess, Paul J.
    Plieninger, Tobias
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 62 : 47 - 65
  • [28] Human perceptions of cultural ecosystem services of semi-natural grasslands: The influence of plant communities
    Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka
    Mocior, Ewelina
    Hibner, Joanna
    Tokarczyk, Natalia
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 46
  • [29] Ecosystem Services of Grazed Grasslands in the Flooding Pampa
    Jacobo, Elizabeth J.
    Rodriguez, Adriana M.
    [J]. PHYTON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2024, 93 (06) : 1179 - 1202
  • [30] A guide to assess and value ecosystem services of grasslands
    Richter, Franziska
    Jan, Pierrick
    El Benni, Nadja
    Luescher, Andreas
    Buchmann, Nina
    Klaus, Valentin H.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 52