Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil

被引:99
|
作者
Dick, Milene [1 ]
da Silva, Marcelo Abreu [2 ]
Dewes, Homero [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, CEPAN, Ctr Res Agribusiness, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Agron, Forage & Agrometeorol Dept, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Biosci Inst, Dept Biophys, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Enteric fermentation; Global warming; Impact categories; Native grassland; Sustainable development; Winter pasture; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; DAIRY PRODUCTION; MILK-PRODUCTION; WESTERN CANADA; WHITE CLOVER; IMPROVEMENT; RYEGRASS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.080
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The importance of animal production in the overall context of human activity is undisputed and influences food supply, job security, income producing, as well as landscape and local ecosystems conservation. This relevance enhances the charges by society as the environmental impacts of various activities, especially in relation to ruminant production amid the current problems of climate changes. In this context, we analyzed the main environmental impacts of two typical beef cattle production systems from southern Brazil, namely the extensive system (ES) and the improved system (IS), and identified the components that have the greatest environmental impacts using the life cycle assessment method. The basis of the system construction was a cattle herd that originated from 100 weaned heifers, four weaned calves, and the progeny of these cattle during their productive life (12 years), and the land areas, external inputs, and other natural resources and technologies necessary to the operations. The functional unit was the production of 1 kg of live weight. The values of greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and freshwater depletion in the ES were higher compared with those values obtained for the IS (22.52 and 9.16 kg CO2 equivalents; 234.78 and 21.03 m(2)a; and 0.217 and 0.0949 m(3), respectively). These variations were attributed to the permanence time of the animals in each system and to the quality and production of the pastures. The ES presented lower potential impacts than the IS on metal depletion and soil acidification (0.000519 and 0.0536 kg Fe equivalents; and 0.0028 and 0.0038 kg SO2 equivalents, respectively) mainly due to the pasture improvement practices and the salt supply to the animals. Moreover, the values of freshwater eutrophication and fossil depletion were higher in the ES than in the IS (0.00383 and 0.00219 kg P equivalents and 0.0042 and 0.1255 kg oil equivalents, respectively). While the pasture nutrient loss from runoff and leaching defined the values of eutrophication, the introduction of legumes compensates the use of fossil fuels. The diversity of the results provides a better understanding of the environmental impacts of different production systems and of regional singularities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 434
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of European beef production systems based on a farm-level optimization model
    Kokemohr, Lennart
    Escobar, Neus
    Mertens, Alexandre
    Mosnier, Claire
    Pirlo, Giacomo
    Veysset, Patrick
    Kuhn, Till
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [42] Assessment of grazing management on farm greenhouse gas intensity of beef production systems in the Canadian Prairies using life cycle assessment
    Alemu, Aldilu W.
    Janzen, Henry
    Little, Shannan
    Hao, Xiying
    Thompson, Donald J.
    Baron, Vern
    Iwaasa, Alan
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Krobel, Roland
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 158 : 1 - 13
  • [43] SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXTENSIVE CATTLE AND SHEEP PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN CHILE
    Avilez, Juan P.
    Nahed, Jose
    Mena, Yolanda
    Grande, Daniel
    Ruiz, Francisco A.
    Camunez, Jose A.
    Meyer, Jorge
    Castel, Jose M.
    [J]. CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 (03) : 228 - 243
  • [44] ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS OF BEEF CATTLE
    Miyake Pini, Thiago Rafael
    da Silva Alencar, Stephan Alexander
    Lucas, Lucia dos Santos
    Brumatti, Ricardo Carneiro
    Franco, Gumercindo Loriano
    Mourao, Gerson Barreto
    da Luz E Silva, Saulo
    [J]. BOLETIM DE INDUSTRIA ANIMAL, 2014, 71 (01): : 47 - 57
  • [45] Intensive grazing systems for beef cattle production
    Fontenot, JP
    Allen, VG
    Cochran, MA
    Frank, NB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE XIX INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS: GRASSLAND ECOSYSTEMS: AN OUTLOOK INTO THE 21ST CENTURY, 2001, : 822 - 823
  • [46] Beef cattle production in established integrated systems
    Gamarra, Erick Lemes
    Morais, Maria da Graca
    de Almeida, Roberto Giolo
    Paludetto, Natalia Aguiar
    Pereira, Mariana
    de Oliveira, Caroline Carvalho
    [J]. SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2017, 38 (05): : 3241 - 3251
  • [47] BEEF-CATTLE AND CROPS PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    HARRIS, RR
    BROWN, VL
    ANTHONY, WB
    KING, CC
    BELL, SC
    EVANS, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1973, 36 (01) : 228 - &
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of natural and mixed recycled aggregate production in Brazil
    Rosado, Lais Peixoto
    Vitale, Pierluca
    Penteado, Carmenlucia Santos G.
    Arena, Umberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 151 : 634 - 642
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol production in India in comparison to Brazil
    Tsiropoulos, Ioannis
    Faaij, Andre P. C.
    Seabra, Joaquim E. A.
    Lundquist, Lars
    Schenker, Urs
    Briois, Jean-Francois
    Patel, Martin K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (05): : 1049 - 1067
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol production in India in comparison to Brazil
    Ioannis Tsiropoulos
    André P. C. Faaij
    Joaquim E. A. Seabra
    Lars Lundquist
    Urs Schenker
    Jean-François Briois
    Martin K. Patel
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1049 - 1067