Measurement of the Ecological and Carbon Footprint in Port Authorities Comparative Study

被引:2
|
作者
Mateo-Mantecon, Ingrid [1 ]
Coto-Millan, Pablo [1 ]
Domenech, Juan L. [2 ]
Angel Pesquera-Gonzalez, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, E-39005 Santander, Spain
[2] Dept Environm, Gijon 33201, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2222-10
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
One of the tools used to determine and measure corporate sustainability is the corporate ecological footprint (CEF). CEF is useful both to understand the impact of human activities on the ecosystem and to provide the correcting measures necessary to minimize the impact produced. This impact, measured in hectares, can be transformed, so it is possible to obtain the amount in emitted carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent tons for a corporate carbon footprint (CCF). Knowing the CCF allows enterprises to be compliant with the measures necessary to mitigate climate change. In this study, the main comparative results of the calculation of the CEF and the CCF, together with other ecoefficiency indicators, are presented for two port authorities located in the Spanish North Coastline. For the calculation of the tons of CO2 emitted by the ports authorities, the composed method of financial accounts was used.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Footprint of tourism: a review of Water, Carbon, and Ecological Footprint applications to the tourism sector
    Miralles, Cristina Casals
    Barioni, Debora
    Mancini, Maria Serena
    Jord, Joan Colon
    Roura, Merce Boy
    Salas, Sergio Ponsa
    Argelaguet, Laia Llenas
    Galli, Alessandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 422
  • [22] Urban ecological footprint analysis: a comparative study between Shenyang in China and Kawasaki in Japan
    Geng, Yong
    Zhang, Liming
    Chen, Xudong
    Xue, Bing
    Fujita, Tsuyoshi
    Dong, Huijuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 75 : 130 - 142
  • [23] Carbon Footprint Measurement and Management: Case Study of the School Forest Enterprise
    Kubova, Pavla
    Hajek, Miroslav
    Trebicky, Viktor
    [J]. BIORESOURCES, 2018, 13 (02): : 4521 - 4535
  • [24] Port allocative efficiency and port devolution: a study for the Spanish port authorities (1992-2016)
    Hidalgo-Gallego, Soraya
    Nunez-Sanchez, Ramon
    Coto-Millan, Pablo
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 49 (01) : 39 - 61
  • [25] Carbon Footprint of a Port Infrastructure from a Life Cycle Approach
    Saravia de los Reyes, Rodrigo
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Gonzalo
    Esteban, Maria Dolores
    Rodriguez, Raul Ruben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (20) : 1 - 16
  • [26] Waste management and determination of carbon footprint of a marine port: a case study from Izmir, Turkey
    Baycan, Neval
    Pehlivan, Yigit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2019, 19 (1-2) : 37 - 53
  • [27] Unveiling the Sensitivity Analysis of Port Carbon Footprint via Power Alternative Scenarios: A Deep Dive into the Valencia Port Case Study
    Issa-Zadeh, Seyed Behbood
    Esteban, M. Dolores
    Lopez-Gutierrez, Jose-Santos
    Garay-Rondero, Claudia Lizette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (08)
  • [28] Study of Wuhan Ecological Sustainable Development Based on Ecological Footprint
    Zhang Xin
    [J]. URBANIZATION AND LAND RESERVATION RESEARCH: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF URBANIZATION AND LAND RESOURCE UTILIZATION, 2010, : 471 - 475
  • [29] The carbon footprint measurement toolkit for the EU Ecolabel
    Gian Luca Baldo
    Massimo Marino
    Marco Montani
    Sven-Olof Ryding
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009, 14 : 591 - 596
  • [30] The carbon footprint measurement toolkit for the EU Ecolabel
    Baldo, Gian Luca
    Marino, Massimo
    Montani, Marco
    Ryding, Sven-Olof
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2009, 14 (07): : 591 - 596