Structural basis for regulation of the Crk signaling protein by a proline switch

被引:13
|
作者
Sarkar, Paramita [1 ]
Saleh, Tamjeed [1 ]
Tzeng, Shiou-Ru [1 ]
Birge, Raymond B. [2 ]
Kalodimos, Charalampos G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, BioMaPS Inst Quantitat Biol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Piscataway, NJ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CIS-TRANS ISOMERIZATION; TERMINAL SH3 DOMAIN; C-ABL KINASE; TYROSINE KINASE; MOLECULAR TIMER; PROLYL ISOMERIZATION; CYCLOPHILIN-A; ADAPTER; NMR; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1038/NCHEMBIO.494
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Proline switches, controlled by cis-trans isomerization, have emerged as a particularly effective regulatory mechanism in a wide range of biological processes. Here we report the structures of both the cis and trans conformers of a proline switch in the Crk signaling protein. Proline isomerization toggles Crk between two conformations: an autoinhibitory conformation, stabilized by the intramolecular association of two tandem SH3 domains in the cis form, and an uninhibited, activated conformation promoted by the trans form. In addition to acting as a structural switch, the heterogeneous proline recruits cyclophilin A, which accelerates the interconversion rate between the isomers, thereby regulating the kinetics of Crk activation. The data provide atomic insight into the mechanisms that underpin the functionality of this binary switch and elucidate its remarkable efficiency. The results also reveal new SH3 binding surfaces, highlighting the binding versatility and expanding the noncanonical ligand repertoire of this important signaling domain.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural basis of a protein partner switch that regulates the general stress response of α-proteobacteria
    Herrou, Julien
    Rotskoff, Grant
    Luo, Yun
    Roux, Benoit
    Crosson, Sean
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (21) : E1415 - E1423
  • [22] Structural Basis for Regulation of Human Glucokinase by Glucokinase Regulatory Protein
    Beck, Tobias
    Miller, Brian G.
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 52 (36) : 6232 - 6239
  • [23] Structural basis for regulation of bifunctional roles in replication initiator protein
    Nakamura, Akira
    Wada, Chieko
    Miki, Kunio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (47) : 18484 - 18489
  • [24] Redox signalling and the structural basis of regulation of photosynthesis by protein phosphorylation
    Allen, JF
    Nilsson, A
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1997, 100 (04) : 863 - 868
  • [25] Structural Basis for the Regulation of Protein Kinase A by Activation Loop Phosphorylation
    Steichen, Jon M.
    Kuchinskas, Michael
    Keshwani, Malik M.
    Yang, Jie
    Adams, Joseph A.
    Taylor, Susan S.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 287 (18) : 14672 - 14680
  • [26] Structural basis of a phototropin light switch
    Harper, SM
    Neil, LC
    Gardner, KH
    SCIENCE, 2003, 301 (5639) : 1541 - 1544
  • [27] Proline-rich sequences mediate the interaction of the Arg protein tyrosine kinase with Crk
    Wang, BL
    Mysliwiec, T
    Feller, SM
    Knudsen, B
    Hanafusa, H
    Kruh, GD
    ONCOGENE, 1996, 13 (07) : 1379 - 1385
  • [28] Structural basis for specificity in protein-tyrosine kinase signaling.
    Cantley, L
    Zhou, SY
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 70 (02) : MPMS3 - MPMS3
  • [29] Structural basis of heteromeric Smad protein assembly in TGF-β signaling
    Chacko, BM
    Qin, BY
    Tiwari, A
    Shi, GB
    Lam, S
    Hayward, LJ
    de Caestecker, M
    Lin, K
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2004, 15 (05) : 813 - 823
  • [30] Structural Basis of a Rationally Rewired Protein-Protein Interface Critical to Bacterial Signaling
    Podgornaia, Anna I.
    Casino, Patricia
    Marina, Alberto
    Laub, Michael T.
    STRUCTURE, 2013, 21 (09) : 1636 - 1647