Genomic Croesus: Experimental evolutionary genetics of Drosophila aging

被引:4
|
作者
Rose, Michael R. [1 ]
Burke, Molly K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Aging; Population genomics; Experimental evolution; Drosophila; QTL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; BRISTLE NUMBER VARIATION; AFFECTING LIFE-SPAN; NATURAL-SELECTION; AFFECTING LONGEVITY; MELANOGASTER; SENESCENCE; GENES; AGE; POLYMORPHISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.exger.2010.08.025
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
For more than 40 years, multiple laboratories have studied Drosophila stocks that have been forced to evolve slowed rates of aging and increased average longevities. These stocks have been used to test both physiological and genetic theories of aging, yielding a number of interesting findings. A little-noticed problem is that these tests have too frequently produced positive results with respect to physiological and genetic mechanisms underlying slowed aging. A genomic interpretation of this copious success is that hundreds of genetic loci have undergone changes in allele frequency or gene expression as a result of selection for slowed aging. This implicates many genetic mechanisms in the control of aging, in general, across the diversity of aging species. As the technology for surveying genomes and transcriptomes continues to improve rapidly, the loci of aging are becoming ever easier to identify. But interpreting the detailed functional consequences of all of these loci presents a radically larger challenge. Like Croesus, experimental gerontology is faced with the problem of genomic foundations for aging which are extremely rich. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 403
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aging: Evolutionary Theory Meets Genomic Approaches
    Sutphin, George L.
    Kennedy, Brian K.
    EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY: CONCEPT, MODELING, AND APPLICATION, 2009, : 339 - +
  • [22] Evolutionary rearrangement of the amylase genomic regions between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura
    Schaeffer, SW
    Bernhardt, MJ
    Anderson, WW
    JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2003, 94 (06) : 464 - 471
  • [23] AGING AND DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER - AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH
    ZWAAN, BJ
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1993, 43 (3-4): : 375 - 381
  • [24] From Nature to the Lab: Establishing Drosophila Resources for Evolutionary Genetics
    Faria, Vitor G.
    Sucena, Elio
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 5
  • [25] EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF 2 SIBLING SPECIES, DROSOPHILA-SIMULANS AND DROSOPHILA-SECHELLIA
    COYNE, JA
    KREITMAN, M
    EVOLUTION, 1986, 40 (04) : 673 - 691
  • [26] Evolutionary Genetics: Small Genomic Regions Make a Big Impact
    Scordato, Elizabeth S. C.
    Safran, Rebecca J.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (21) : R1155 - R1157
  • [27] Role of genomic typing in taxonomy, evolutionary genetics, and microbial epidemiology
    van Belkum, A
    Struelens, M
    de Visser, A
    Verbrugh, H
    Tibayrenc, M
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2001, 14 (03) : 547 - +
  • [28] Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba
    Pettie, Nikale
    Llopart, Ana
    Comeron, Josep M.
    PLOS GENETICS, 2022, 18 (03):
  • [29] Genomic signatures of experimental adaptive radiation in Drosophila
    Michalak, Pawel
    Kang, Lin
    Schou, Mads F.
    Garner, Harold R.
    Loeschcke, Volker
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 600 - 614
  • [30] THE EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF THE HOBO TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT IN THE DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER COMPLEX
    PERIQUET, G
    LEMEUNIER, F
    BIGOT, Y
    HAMELIN, MH
    BAZIN, C
    LADEVEZE, V
    EEKEN, J
    GALINDO, MI
    PASCUAL, L
    BOUSSY, I
    GENETICA, 1994, 93 (1-3) : 79 - 90