Model predictive control-based dynamic coordinate strategy for hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system of a heavy commercial vehicle

被引:41
|
作者
Zeng, Xiaohua [1 ]
Li, Guanghan [1 ]
Yin, Guodong [2 ]
Song, Dafeng [1 ]
Li, Sheng [3 ]
Yang, Nannan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, State Key Lab Automot Simulat & Control, Changchun 130025, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] FAW Jiefang Automot CO LTD, Qingdao 266043, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system; Dynamic coordinate; Model predictive control; Nonlinear model; Heavy commercial vehicle; REGENERATIVE BRAKING; CONTROL ALLOCATION; PNEUMATIC TIRES; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; SIMULATIONS; FEEDFORWARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.029
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Equipping a hydraulic hub-motor auxiliary system (HHMAS), which mainly consists of a hydraulic variable pump, a hydraulic hub-motor, a hydraulic valve block and hydraulic accumulators, with part-time all-wheel-drive functions improves the power performance and fuel economy of heavy commercial vehicles. The coordinated control problem that occurs when HHMAS operates in the auxiliary drive mode is addressed in this paper; the solution to this problem is the key to the maximization of HHMAS. To achieve a reasonable distribution of the engine power between mechanical and hydraulic paths, a nonlinear control scheme based on model predictive control (MPC) is investigated. First, a nonlinear model of HHMAS with vehicle dynamics and tire slip characteristics is built, and a controller-design-oriented model is simplified. Then, a steady-state feedforward + dynamic MPC feedback controller (FMPC) is designed to calculate the control input sequence of engine torque and hydraulic variable pump displacement. Finally, the controller is tested in the MATLAB/Simulink and AMESim co-simulation platform and the hardware-in-the loop experiment platform, and its performance is compared with that of the existing pro portional-integral-derivative controller and the feedforward controller under the same conditions. Simulation results show that the designed FMPC has the best performance, and control performance can be guaranteed in a real-time environment. Compared with the tracking control error of the feedforward controller, that of the designed FMPC is decreased by 85% and the traction efficiency performance is improved by 23% under a low-friction-surface condition. Moreover, under common road conditions for heavy commercial vehicles, the traction force can increase up to 13.4-15.6%. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 120
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An intelligent model predictive control-based strategy for plantwide optimization of degrading plants
    Hadjiski, Mincho
    Grancharova, Alexandra
    Petrova, Valeria
    Boshnakov, Kosta
    2016 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IS), 2016, : 388 - 393
  • [32] Front wheel angle control for steering system of intelligent commercial vehicle based on model predictive control
    Li, Yafei
    Yang, Yiyong
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2023, 17 (11) : 2268 - 2284
  • [33] Active Disturbance Rejection Control-based Robust Model Predictive Current Control for Induction Motor
    He, Hucheng
    Liu, Botao
    Wang, Qin
    Tan, Fuchen
    Gui, Haoya
    Zhang, Chenyang
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 17 (06) : 3413 - 3425
  • [34] Active disturbance rejection control-based model free predictive current control for an induction motor
    He, Hucheng
    Xu, Jingzhe
    Tan, Fuchen
    Liu, Xunwen
    Zhang, Jie
    Zhai, Heng
    Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2024, 52 (13): : 149 - 160
  • [35] Model predictive control-based power dispatch for distribution system considering plug-in electric vehicle uncertainty
    Su, Wencong
    Wang, Jianhui
    Zhang, Kuilin
    Huang, Alex Q.
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 106 : 29 - 35
  • [36] Koopman Model Predictive Control-based Power System Stabilizer Design
    Han, Wenjie
    Stankovic, Alex M.
    2020 52ND NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM (NAPS), 2021,
  • [37] Active Disturbance Rejection Control-based Robust Model Predictive Current Control for Induction Motor
    Hucheng He
    Botao Liu
    Qin Wang
    Fuchen Tan
    Haoya Gui
    Chenyang Zhang
    Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2022, 17 : 3413 - 3425
  • [38] Model predictive control-based efficient energy recovery control strategy for regenerative braking system of hybrid electric bus
    Li, Liang
    Zhang, Yuanbo
    Yang, Chao
    Yan, Bingjie
    Martinez, C. Marina
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 111 : 299 - 314
  • [39] Investigation of Control Strategy for Hydraulic Auxiliary Braking of Tracked Vehicle Based on Pump Efficiency Analysis
    Teng, Fei
    Lv, Jiangang
    Sun, Yao
    Guo, Shaoyan
    FRONTIERS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 184-185 : 1633 - +
  • [40] A new model predictive torque control strategy for permanent magnet synchronous hub motor of EVs
    Chen L.
    Xu H.
    Sun X.
    International Journal of Vehicle Performance, 2021, 7 (3-4): : 207 - 225