Multimodality imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant cardiac masses

被引:10
|
作者
Aghayev, Ayaz [1 ]
Cheezum, Michael K. [2 ]
Steigner, Michael L. [1 ]
Mousavi, Negareh [3 ]
Padera, Robert [4 ]
Barac, Ana [5 ]
Kwong, Raymond Y. [6 ]
Di Carli, Marcelo F. [7 ]
Blankstein, Ron [7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Cardiovasc Imaging Program, Dept Radiol, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Parkview Hlth, Dept Cardiol, Ft Wayne, IN USA
[3] McGill Univ, Cardiovasc Div, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Georgetown Univ, MedStar Heart & Vasc Inst, Washington, DC USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Cardiovasc Imaging Program, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
MRI; PET; modalities; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; LIPOMATOUS HYPERTROPHY; INTERATRIAL SEPTUM; DIAGNOSIS; MANAGEMENT; TUMORS; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-021-02790-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CMR and FDG-PET/CT and their complementary role to distinguish benign vs malignant cardiac masses. Methods. Retrospectively assessed patients with cardiac mass who underwent CMR and FDG-PET/CT within a month between 2003 and 2018. Results. 72 patients who had CMR and FDG-PET/CT were included. 25 patients (35%) were diagnosed with benign and 47 (65%) were diagnosed with malignant masses. 56 patients had histological correlation: 9 benign and 47 malignant masses. CMR and FDG-PET/CT had a high accuracy in differentiating benign vs malignant masses, with the presence of CMR features demonstrating a higher sensitivity (98%), while FDG uptake with SUVmax/blood pool >= 3.0 demonstrating a high specificity (88%). Combining multiple (> 4) CMR features and FDG uptake (SUVmax/blood pool ratio >= 3.0) yielded a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 88% to diagnose malignant masses. Over a mean follow-up of 2.6 years (IQR 0.3-3.8 years), risk-adjusted mortality were highest among patients with an infiltrative border on CMR (adjusted HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5-6.5; P = .002) or focal extracardiac FDG uptake (adjusted HR 3.8; 95% CI 1.9-7.7; P < .001). Conclusion. Although CMR and FDG-PET/CT can independently diagnose benign and malignant masses, the combination of these modalities provides complementary value in select cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1504 / 1517
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Solid Breast Masses
    Diao, Xuehong
    Zhan, Jia
    Chen, Lin
    Chen, Yue
    Cao, Hongli
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2020, 20 (06) : E786 - E793
  • [22] Breast Lesion Diameter in VisR Imaging Differs Between Malignant and Benign Masses in Women
    Phillips, Anna V.
    Torres, Gabriela
    Steed, Doreen
    Caughey, Melissa C.
    Merhout, Jasmin
    Kirk, Shanah R.
    Hartman, Terry S.
    Kuzmiak, Cherie M.
    Ray, Emily M.
    Gallippi, Caterina M.
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IEEE IUS), 2022,
  • [23] MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review
    Lotte W. E. van Nimwegen
    Annelies M. C. Mavinkurve-Groothuis
    Ronald R. de Krijger
    Caroline C. C. Hulsker
    Angelique J. Goverde
    József Zsiros
    Annemieke S. Littooij
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 1166 - 1181
  • [24] MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review
    van Nimwegen, Lotte W. E.
    Mavinkurve-Groothuis, Annelies M. C.
    de Krijger, Ronald R.
    Hulsker, Caroline C. C.
    Goverde, Angelique J.
    Zsiros, Jozsef
    Littooij, Annemieke S.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 1166 - 1181
  • [25] Can diffusion-weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant pediatric liver tumors?
    Pablo Caro-Domínguez
    Abha A. Gupta
    Govind B. Chavhan
    Pediatric Radiology, 2018, 48 : 85 - 93
  • [26] Can diffusion-weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant pediatric liver tumors?
    Caro-Dominguez, Pablo
    Gupta, Abha A.
    Chavhan, Govind B.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [27] Radiomics approach to distinguish between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors on magnetic resonance imaging
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Meng-Yue
    Qi, Liang
    Zou, Yue-Fen
    Fei-Yun, Wu
    Sun, Xiu-Lan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2024, 12
  • [28] Multidetector CT of the heart: Spectrum of benign and malignant cardiac masses
    Chu L.C.
    Johnson P.T.
    Halushka M.K.
    Fishman E.K.
    Emergency Radiology, 2012, 19 (5) : 415 - 428
  • [29] Can Contrast-Enhanced Sonography Distinguish Benign From Malignant Breast Masses?
    Sorelli, P. G.
    Cosgrove, D. O.
    Svensson, W. E.
    Zaman, N.
    Satchithananda, K.
    Barrett, N. K.
    Lim, A. K. P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2010, 38 (04) : 177 - 181
  • [30] Benign and Malignant Ovarian Teratomas: Multimodality Imaging Findings With Histopathologic Correlation
    Laothamatas, Indira
    Fang, Eric
    Lee, Justine
    Abbas, Syed Muhammad Hashim
    Ding, Juan
    Kagen, Alexander
    Zakashansky, Konstantin
    Taouli, Bachir
    Kamath, Amita
    King, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 47 (06) : 882 - 889