Effect of nationwide concurrent drug utilization review program on drug-drug interactions and related health outcome

被引:4
|
作者
Kim, Dong-Sook [1 ]
Je, Nam Kyung [2 ]
Park, Juhee [1 ]
Lee, Sukhyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Dept Res, HyeoksinRo 60, Wonju 26465, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Coll Pharm, Pusandaehakro 63Gil 2, Busan 14624, South Korea
[3] Ajou Univ, Coll Pharm, WorldcupRo 206, Suwon 16499, South Korea
关键词
drug utilization review; drug-drug interaction; hospitalization; emergency department visit; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS; SYSTEM; RISK; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzab118
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A computerized drug utilization review (DUR) program has provided physicians and pharmacists with alerts on drug-drug interactions (DDIs), drug-age precautions and therapeutic duplication in Korea since 2010. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the DUR program on health outcomes associated with DDIs. Methods: An uncontrolled before-after study was performed to investigate the impact of the nationwide DUR program on DDIs and related health outcomes. The study population consisted of people who used two types of DDI pairs before DUR implementation (from January 2009 to December 2010) and post-DUR implementation (from January 2012 to December 2013); (i) benzodiazepines with concurrent use of metabolic enzyme inhibitors and (ii) QTc (heart-rate corrected QT interval) prolongation agents. The main outcome measures were all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization admissions or emergency department (ED) visits. Results: This study included 107 874 people who used benzodiazepines with enzyme inhibitors and 8489 who received co-medication of QTc prolongation agents. For patients receiving a combination of benzodiazepines and enzyme inhibitors, both all-cause hospitalization and causespecific hospitalization decreased after DUR implementation, from 43.2% to 41.7% and from 4.6% to 4.5% (adjusted odds ratio [OR]= 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-0.98; OR= 0.89, 95% CI= 0.84-0.99, respectively). For patients receiving co-medication of QTc prolongation agents, all-cause hospitalization (54.2%) was lower than before (54.9%) (OR= 0.87, 95% CI= 0.79-0.96), but no significant change was found for cause-specific hospitalization and ED visits. Conclusion: Implementation of a DUR program may reduce the adverse health outcomes posed by DDIs in patients on combination of benzodiazepines and enzyme inhibitors potentially QTc-prolongation agents.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Avoiding Drug-Drug Interactions
    Astrand, Bengt
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 55 (04) : 215 - 220
  • [32] DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS IN THE NEWBORN
    CONTERAS, EA
    SUTTER, TK
    LOHLA, ER
    PHAN, DK
    NEUROBEHAVIORAL TOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1985, 7 (02): : 204 - 204
  • [33] Drug-drug interactions in urology
    Michel, M. C.
    Schaefers, R. F.
    de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H.
    UROLOGE, 2009, 48 (03): : 264 - +
  • [34] Drug-drug interactions in the ICU
    S Ray
    M Bhattacharyya
    J Pramanik
    S Todi
    Critical Care, 13 (Suppl 1):
  • [35] COCAINE DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS
    SANDS, BF
    CIRAULO, DA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 12 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [36] Predicting drug-drug interactions
    Tucker, GT
    DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2005, 37 : 5 - 5
  • [37] Drug-drug interactions - Reply
    DeVane, CL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 57 (05) : 225 - 227
  • [38] DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS IN HOSPITAL
    MOK, H
    MULPETER, K
    OCONNOR, P
    FEELY, J
    IRISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 84 (01) : 26 - 26
  • [39] Drug-drug interactions with antipsychotics
    Meyer, Jonathan
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2007, 12 (12) : 6 - 9
  • [40] Dolutegravir drug-drug interactions
    Mondleki, E.
    Maartens, G.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 112 (03): : 194 - 195