Which is better - Retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?

被引:39
|
作者
Canon, Stephen J. [1 ]
Jayanthi, Venkata R. [1 ]
Lowe, Gregory J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus Childrens Hosp, Urol Sect, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2007年 / 178卷 / 04期
关键词
ureter; kidney; ureteral obstruction; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.200
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Groups at multiple institutions have documented the efficacy of minimally invasive repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic approach. To our knowledge no group has compared the 2 operative procedures directly at a single institution. Materials and Methods: The records of 49 consecutive patients with a history of retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty or transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction were reviewed retrospectively, of whom 29 underwent attempted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty and 20 underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty cases were performed first in the series before changing to the laparoscopic pyeloplasty approach. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty was performed using an anterolateral approach with retroperitoneal balloon distention. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty repair was performed using a transmesenteric approach for left ureteropelvic junction obstruction or after right colon mobilization for right repairs. Dismembered pyeloplasty was performed over a stent using 5-zero polydioxanone suture. Stents were placed antegrade or retrograde based on anatomy and presenting symptoms. Parameters studied were patient age, operative time, postoperative analgesic requirement during hospitalization, hospital stay and success rate. Results: No difference was observed between the 2 groups in patient age, success rate, hospital stay or analgesic narcotic requirement. Average operative time for retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty was significantly longer than for laparoscopic pyeloplasty (239.1 vs 184.8 minutes). Overall success rates were also statistically equivalent (25 of 27 retroperitoneoscopic and 19 of 19 laparoscopic pyeloplasties) with incomplete followup in 1 patient in the retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty group and 1 in the laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Three children, including 2 with retroperitoneoscopic and 1 with laparoscopic pyeloplasty, had transient urinary extravasation postoperatively, which was related to poorly positioned stents. Five patients in the retroperitoneoscopic group and 1 in the laparoscopic group underwent balloon dilation for indistinct but persistent postoperative flank pain with equivocal radiological findings. There were no major complications following either technique. Conclusions: In our experience no major difference exists between the retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic approaches for correcting ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The difference in operative time likely reflects the learning curve for laparoscopic suturing and dissection. Currently we prefer the laparoscopic approach because of the larger working space for suturing, the perceived ease of antegrade stent placement and the subjective improvement in cosmetic outcome. The 2 techniques should be considered equal with regard to the successful correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:1791 / 1795
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transperitoneal dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A271 - A271
  • [22] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    Sasaki, Shoichi
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 472 - 476
  • [23] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Always Dismembered?
    Amon Sesmero, Jose Heriberto
    Cepeda Delgado, Marcos
    de la Cruz Martin, Beatriz
    Ruiz Serrano, Manuel
    Mainez Rodriguez, Juan Antonio
    Tapia Herrero, Ana Maria
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (07) : 778 - 782
  • [24] Transcoelomic laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty
    Abdel-Hakim, Amr
    Abdel-Hakim, Ahmed
    El-Feel, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A175 - A176
  • [25] PEDIATRIC LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY
    PETERS, CA
    SCHLUSSEL, RN
    RETIK, AB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (06): : 1962 - 1965
  • [26] One-Port Retroperitoneoscopic Assisted Pyeloplasty Versus Open Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Young Children: Preliminary Experience
    Caione, Paolo
    Lais, Alberto
    Nappo, Simona Gerocarni
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (05): : 2109 - 2115
  • [27] Retroperitoneoscopic assisted single-site pyeloplasty using EZ access in children: Comparison with open dismembered pyeloplasty
    Yamazaki, Yuichiro
    Kim, Woo Jin
    Akiyama, Sayaka
    Ikeda, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (04) : 574 - 577
  • [28] Retroperitoneoscopic Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in infants and children: a 60-case report
    Huixia Zhou
    Hongzhao Li
    Xu Zhang
    Xin Ma
    Hua Xu
    Taoping Shi
    Baojun Wang
    Guoxi Zhang
    Zhenghua Ju
    Chao Wang
    Jun Li
    Zhun Wu
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2009, 25 : 519 - 523
  • [29] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years
    Cascio, S.
    Tien, A.
    Chee, W.
    Tan, H. L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01): : 335 - 338
  • [30] Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children.
    Tan, HL
    PEDIATRICS, 1998, 102 (03) : 855 - 855