Effects of mask bias on the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) for low k1 lithography process

被引:6
|
作者
Chang, YY [1 ]
Wu, YH [1 ]
Shih, CL [1 ]
Lin, JP [1 ]
Kan, F [1 ]
Lin, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanya Technol Corp, Technol Dev Div, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XII, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2005年 / 5853卷
关键词
Mask Error Enhancement Factor(MEEF); resolution; off axis illumination (OAI); k1; factor; process window (PW); critical dimension (CD);
D O I
10.1117/12.617212
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Mask Error Enhancement Factor(MEEF) has recently become an important topic in determining requirements of process. MEEF is the ratio of the CD range on the wafer and the expected CD range due to the mask. It indicates that mask CD errors are in effect magnified during the optical transfer to the wafer. The resolution capability of a optical system is given by Rayleigh's criterions: Resolution=k1*lambda/NA, where, is the wavelength of the light used and NA is defined as the sine of the maximum half angle( a) of diffracted light which can enter the lens. The k1 resolution-scaling factor (k1=CD*NA/,) is a practical measure for expressing imaging feasibility of a given optical system. It is a important parameter and direct proportion to resolution requirement. For driving critical CD dimension contraction bellow 0.11 mu m, lower k1 factor is needed. In this work we use strong OAI (Quasar 90 degrees) to push k1 reach 0.29 by KrF exposure tool and analysis the MEEF value on 90mn generation. The simulation result shows the predicted MEEF value is close to 9 while using KrF to 90nm resolution and real MEEF value from exposuring Line/Space pattern on wafer data is 6.2. In such high MEEF process, it is very important to control mask CD accuracy. We bring up a test pattern of serial combinations with different Line/Space dimension with the same pitch size to reduce the mask array CD variation. Finally, we compare the process window (PW) between equal and nonequal Line/Space situation. The process window can be improved 18% while line width extends from 90nm to 95nm at fixed pitch 180nm.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 766
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulations of mask error enhancement factor in 193 nm immersion lithography
    Yeh, Kwei-Tin
    Loong, Wen-An
    Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers, 2006, 45 (4 A): : 2481 - 2496
  • [22] Methodology to setup mask CD specification including MEEF and process sensitivity of mask CD error
    Shim, Yeon-Ah
    Park, Se-Jin
    Kim, Ju-Hyun
    Kim, Jea-Hee
    Kim, Keeho
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIX, PTS 1-3, 2006, 6154 : U2457 - U2465
  • [23] The MEF revisited:: Low k1 effects versus mask topography effects
    Pierrat, C
    Wong, A
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XVI, PTS 1-3, 2003, 5040 : 193 - 202
  • [24] Maintaining lithographic quality during OPC for low k1 and MEEF processes constrained by Mask Dimensional Rules.
    Cork, C
    Melvin, LS
    Miller, M
    Lugg, R
    Rieger, ML
    24TH ANNUAL BACUS SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY, PT 1 AND 2, 2004, 5567 : 1161 - 1167
  • [25] Lithography process optimization for 130nm poly gate mask and the impact of mask error factor
    Hsu, S
    Shi, XL
    Socha, RJ
    Chen, JF
    Yee, J
    Ananth, M
    Desai, S
    Imamura, PH
    Sherrill, M
    Tseng, YC
    Chang, HA
    Kao, JF
    Tseng, A
    Liu, WJ
    Chen, A
    Li, A
    Kujten, JP
    Jacobs, E
    Verhappen, A
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XV, 2001, 4344 : 783 - 796
  • [26] Simulations of mask error enhancement factor in 193nm immersion lithography
    Yeh, KT
    Loong, WA
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS PART 1-REGULAR PAPERS BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS & REVIEW PAPERS, 2006, 45 (4A): : 2481 - 2496
  • [27] MEEF measurement and model verification for 0.3 k1 lithography
    Parker, CR
    Reilly, MT
    CHALLENGES IN PROCESS INTEGRATION AND DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 4181 : 33 - 40
  • [28] The effects of mask error factor on process window capability
    Schurz, D
    Flack, WW
    Cohen, S
    Newman, T
    Nguyen, K
    19TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3873 : 215 - 225
  • [29] Impact of resist on the mask error enhancement factor
    Mack, Chris A.
    Microlithography World, 2000, 9 (01):
  • [30] Mask modeling in the low k1 and ultrahigh NA regime:: Phase and polarization effects
    Erdmann, A
    EMLC 2005: 21st European Mask and Lithography Conference, 2005, 5835 : 69 - 81