Effects of mask bias on the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) for low k1 lithography process

被引:6
|
作者
Chang, YY [1 ]
Wu, YH [1 ]
Shih, CL [1 ]
Lin, JP [1 ]
Kan, F [1 ]
Lin, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanya Technol Corp, Technol Dev Div, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XII, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2005年 / 5853卷
关键词
Mask Error Enhancement Factor(MEEF); resolution; off axis illumination (OAI); k1; factor; process window (PW); critical dimension (CD);
D O I
10.1117/12.617212
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Mask Error Enhancement Factor(MEEF) has recently become an important topic in determining requirements of process. MEEF is the ratio of the CD range on the wafer and the expected CD range due to the mask. It indicates that mask CD errors are in effect magnified during the optical transfer to the wafer. The resolution capability of a optical system is given by Rayleigh's criterions: Resolution=k1*lambda/NA, where, is the wavelength of the light used and NA is defined as the sine of the maximum half angle( a) of diffracted light which can enter the lens. The k1 resolution-scaling factor (k1=CD*NA/,) is a practical measure for expressing imaging feasibility of a given optical system. It is a important parameter and direct proportion to resolution requirement. For driving critical CD dimension contraction bellow 0.11 mu m, lower k1 factor is needed. In this work we use strong OAI (Quasar 90 degrees) to push k1 reach 0.29 by KrF exposure tool and analysis the MEEF value on 90mn generation. The simulation result shows the predicted MEEF value is close to 9 while using KrF to 90nm resolution and real MEEF value from exposuring Line/Space pattern on wafer data is 6.2. In such high MEEF process, it is very important to control mask CD accuracy. We bring up a test pattern of serial combinations with different Line/Space dimension with the same pitch size to reduce the mask array CD variation. Finally, we compare the process window (PW) between equal and nonequal Line/Space situation. The process window can be improved 18% while line width extends from 90nm to 95nm at fixed pitch 180nm.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 766
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of mask bias on the Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF) of contact holes
    Kang, D
    Robertson, S
    Reilly, N
    Pavelchek, E
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4346 : 858 - 868
  • [2] Impact of MEEF on low k1 lithography and mask inspection
    Qian, QD
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 4000 : 588 - 593
  • [3] Source optimization and mask design to minimize MEEF in low k1 lithography
    Xiao, Guangming
    Cecil, Tom
    Pang, Lingyong
    Gleason, Bob
    McCarty, John
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 7028
  • [4] Mask topography effects in low k1 lithography.
    McCallum, M
    Gordon, R
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 4000 : 695 - 700
  • [5] Determining mask effects in low k1 lithography.
    McCallum, M
    Gordon, R
    MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 53 (1-4) : 109 - 112
  • [6] SMO mask requirements for low k1 lithography
    Nagahara, Seiji
    Kawahara, Kazuyoshi
    Yamazaki, Hiroshi
    Ando, Akihiko
    Naganuma, Masayuki
    Yoshimochi, Kazuyuki
    Uchiyama, Takayuki
    Nakashima, Ken
    Imai, Hidemichi
    Hayano, Katsuya
    Migita, Hidekazu
    Tsujimoto, Eiji
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2010, 2010, 7823
  • [7] The ArF lithography - Challenges, resolution capability and the mask error enhancement function (MEEF)
    Plat, M
    Lyons, C
    Wilkison, A
    Schefske, J
    Kim, HE
    LITHOGRAPHY FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING II, 2001, 4404 : 162 - 169
  • [8] Resolution capability and the mask error enhancement function (MEEF) for ArF and KrF Lithography
    Plat, M
    Spence, C
    Lyons, C
    Wilkison, A
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4346 : 851 - 857
  • [9] Reduction of mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) by the optimum exposure dose self-adjusted mask
    Matsuura, S
    Uchiyama, T
    Hashimoto, T
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 4346 : 831 - 841
  • [10] Mask compensation for process flare in 193nm very low K1 lithography
    Lee, Jeonkyu
    Lee, Taehyeong
    Oh, Sangjin
    Kang, Chunsoo
    Kim, Jungchan
    Choi, Jaeseung
    Park, Chanha
    Yang, Hyunjo
    Yim, Donggyu
    Do, Munhoe
    Su, Irene
    Song, Hua
    Choi, Jung-Hoe
    Fan, Yongfa
    Wang, Anthony Chunqing
    Lee, Sung-Woo
    Boone, Robert
    Lucas, Kevin
    OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXVI, 2013, 8683