Vitamin B12 (B12) is present in foods of animal origin, and vegans are encouraged to take supplements with synthetic B12 in order to ensure a sufficient uptake. Recent rat studies suggest that natural (hydroxo-B12, HO-B12) and synthetic (cyano-B12, CN-B12) B12 behave differently in the body. Here, we test if a daily vitamin pill matches dietary B12 in ability to restore a low B12 status in rats. B12-depleted male Wistar rats (n = 60) were divided into five groups (n = 12 in each) and subjected to two weeks intervention with various schemes of B12 supplementation. Two dietary groups received a low-B12 chow that was fortified with either HO-B12 or CN-B12 providing a continuous supply. Two pill groups received a single daily dose of CN-B12, where the vitamin content either matched or exceeded by factor four the provisions for the dietary groups. A control group received the low-B12 chow without B12 fortification. B12 was measured in plasma and tissues. Dietary B12 provides 35% more B12 to the tissues than an equivalent single daily dose (p < 0.0001). Natural B12 delivers 25% more B12 to the liver than synthetic B12 (p = 0.0007). A fourfold increase in B12, supplemented as a single daily dose, does not provide any extra B12 to the tissues (p = 0.45). We conclude that dietary B12 is better at rescuing a low B12 status than a daily vitamin pill.
机构:
St Thomas Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Nutristasis Unit, 4th Floor North Wing Viapath, London SE1 7EH, England
Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Div Womens Hlth, London, EnglandSt Thomas Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Nutristasis Unit, 4th Floor North Wing Viapath, London SE1 7EH, England