Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research

被引:35
|
作者
Doyle, J
Waters, E
Yach, D
McQueen, D
De Francisco, A
Stewart, T
Reddy, P
Gulmezoglu, AM
Galea, G
Portela, A
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Cochrane Hlth Promot & Publ Hlth Field, Melbourne, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Global Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] MRC, Hlth Promot Res & Dev Grp, Pretoria, South Africa
[4] WHO, World Bank Special Programe Res Dev & Res Trainin, WHO Reprod Hlth Library,UNFPA, HRP,UNDP, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] WHO, Off Western Pacific Manila, Manila, Philippines
[6] WHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, Making Pregnancy Safer Initiat, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.2003.019547
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions are increasingly being conducted to assist public policy decision making. Many intra-country initiatives have been established to conduct systematic reviews in their relevant public health areas. The Cochrane Collaboration, an international organisation established to conduct and publish systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, is committed to high quality reviews that are regularly updated, published electronically, and meeting the needs of the consumers. Aims: To identify global priorities for Cochrane systematic reviews of public health topics. Methods: Systematic reviews of public health interventions were identified and mapped against global health risks. Global health organisations were engaged and nominated policy-urgent titles, evidence based selection criteria were applied to set priorities. Results: 26 priority systematic review titles were identified, addressing interventions such as community building activities, pre-natal and early infancy psychosocial outcomes, and improving the nutrition status of refugee and displaced populations. Discussion: The 26 priority titles provide an opportunity for potential reviewers and indeed, the Cochrane Collaboration as a whole, to address the previously unmet needs of global health policy and research agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 197
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characteristics of the Cochrane Oral Health Group Systematic Reviews
    Teich, Sorin T.
    Lang, Lisa A.
    Demko, Catherine A.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2015, 79 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [22] Involving citizens in priority setting for public health research: Implementation in infection research
    Rawson, Timothy M.
    Castro-Sanchez, Enrique
    Charani, Esmita
    Husson, Fran
    Moore, Luke S. P.
    Holmes, Alison H.
    Ahmad, Raheelah
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) : 222 - 229
  • [23] Strengthening public health priority-setting through research on fistula, maternal health, and health inequities
    Bangser, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2007, 99 : S16 - S20
  • [24] Reviews, systematic reviews, and essays in public health
    Bastos, Francisco L.
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2007, 23 (06): : 1253 - 1253
  • [25] The workplace: A priority setting for health promotion Emilia Guberti
    Guberti, E.
    Marzocchi, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27 : 515 - 515
  • [26] Pain as a global public health priority
    Goldberg, Daniel S.
    McGee, Summer J.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [27] Pain as a global public health priority
    Daniel S Goldberg
    Summer J McGee
    BMC Public Health, 11
  • [28] Systematic reviews in health research
    Tanner-Smith, Emily E.
    Egger, Matthias
    Higgins, Julian
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2019, 10 (03) : 310 - 311
  • [29] Evidence-basing of health promotion:: Suitability of the methodology of the Cochrane reviews
    Kreis, J
    Bödeker, W
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2005, 67 (07) : 516 - 516
  • [30] Worksite health promotion - Systematic reviews on obesity
    Pronk, N
    ACSMS HEALTH & FITNESS JOURNAL, 2005, 9 (01) : 34 - 36