Polarization of Drosophila Neuroblasts During Asymmetric Division

被引:80
|
作者
Prehoda, Kenneth E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Chem, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Inst Mol Biol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
来源
关键词
REGULATES SPINDLE ORIENTATION; NEURAL STEM-CELLS; G-ALPHA-I; SELF-RENEWAL; CORTICAL POLARITY; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; EPITHELIAL POLARITY; APICAL LOCALIZATION; MUSCLE PROGENITORS; PAR COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1101/cshperspect.a001388
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
During Drosophila development, neuroblasts divide to generate progeny with two different fates. One daughter cell self-renews to maintain the neuroblast pool, whereas the other differentiates to populate the central nervous system. The difference in fate arises from the asymmetric distribution of proteins that specify either self-renewal or differentiation, which is brought about by their polarization into separate apical and basal cortical domains during mitosis. Neuroblast symmetry breaking is regulated by numerous proteins, many of which have only recently been discovered. The atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is a broad regulator of polarity that localizes to the neuroblast apical cortical region and directs the polarization of the basal domain. Recent work suggests that polarity can be explained in large part by the mechanisms that restrict aPKC activity to the apical domain and those that couple asymmetric aPKC activity to the polarization of downstream factors. Polarized aPKC activity is created by a network of regulatory molecules, including Bazooka/Par-3, Cdc42, and the tumor suppressor Lgl, which represses basal recruitment. Direct phosphorylation by aPKC leads to cortical release of basal domain factors, preventing them from occupying the apical domain. In this framework, neuroblast polarity arises from a complex system that orchestrates robust aPKC polarity, which in turn polarizes substrates by coupling phosphorylation to cortical release.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The last-born daughter cell contributes to division orientation of Drosophila larval neuroblasts
    Nicolas Loyer
    Jens Januschke
    Nature Communications, 9
  • [42] The last-born daughter cell contributes to division orientation of Drosophila larval neuroblasts
    Loyer, Nicolas
    Januschke, Jens
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
  • [43] Restriction on self-renewing asymmetric division is coupled to terminal asymmetric division in the Drosophila CNS
    Gaziova, Ivana
    Gazi, Michael
    Mar, Jordan
    Bhat, Krishna Moorthi
    PLOS GENETICS, 2020, 16 (09):
  • [44] Drosophila Incenp is required for cytokinesis and asymmetric cell division during development of the nervous system
    Chang, CJ
    Goulding, S
    Adams, RR
    Earnshaw, WC
    Carmena, M
    JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2006, 119 (06) : 1144 - 1153
  • [45] Signaling networks during development:: the case of asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila nervous system
    Carmena, Ana
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 321 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [46] Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts
    Broadus, J
    Doe, CQ
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (11) : 827 - 835
  • [47] Drosophila mechanoreceptors as a model for studying asymmetric cell division
    Furman, Dagmara P.
    Bukharina, Tatyana A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 55 (02): : 133 - 141
  • [48] Adherens junctions inhibit asymmetric division in the Drosophila epithelium
    Bingwei Lu
    Fabrice Roegiers
    Lily Y. Jan
    Yuh Nung Jan
    Nature, 2001, 409 : 522 - 525
  • [49] Adherens junctions inhibit asymmetric division in the Drosophila epithelium
    Lu, BW
    Roegiers, F
    Jan, LY
    Jan, YN
    NATURE, 2001, 409 (6819) : 522 - 525
  • [50] Asymmetric cell division in the morphogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster macrochaetae
    T. A. Bukharina
    D. P. Furman
    Russian Journal of Developmental Biology, 2011, 42 : 63 - 72