Polarization of Drosophila Neuroblasts During Asymmetric Division

被引:80
|
作者
Prehoda, Kenneth E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Chem, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Inst Mol Biol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
来源
关键词
REGULATES SPINDLE ORIENTATION; NEURAL STEM-CELLS; G-ALPHA-I; SELF-RENEWAL; CORTICAL POLARITY; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; EPITHELIAL POLARITY; APICAL LOCALIZATION; MUSCLE PROGENITORS; PAR COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1101/cshperspect.a001388
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
During Drosophila development, neuroblasts divide to generate progeny with two different fates. One daughter cell self-renews to maintain the neuroblast pool, whereas the other differentiates to populate the central nervous system. The difference in fate arises from the asymmetric distribution of proteins that specify either self-renewal or differentiation, which is brought about by their polarization into separate apical and basal cortical domains during mitosis. Neuroblast symmetry breaking is regulated by numerous proteins, many of which have only recently been discovered. The atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) is a broad regulator of polarity that localizes to the neuroblast apical cortical region and directs the polarization of the basal domain. Recent work suggests that polarity can be explained in large part by the mechanisms that restrict aPKC activity to the apical domain and those that couple asymmetric aPKC activity to the polarization of downstream factors. Polarized aPKC activity is created by a network of regulatory molecules, including Bazooka/Par-3, Cdc42, and the tumor suppressor Lgl, which represses basal recruitment. Direct phosphorylation by aPKC leads to cortical release of basal domain factors, preventing them from occupying the apical domain. In this framework, neuroblast polarity arises from a complex system that orchestrates robust aPKC polarity, which in turn polarizes substrates by coupling phosphorylation to cortical release.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Asymmetric cell division of Drosophila neuroblasts
    Doe, CQ
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2001, 12 : 394A - 394A
  • [2] Vibrator regulates asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts
    Koe, Chwee Tat
    Tan, Ye Sing
    Lonnfors, Max
    Hur, Seong Kwon
    Yu, Fengwei
    Bankaitis, Vytas A.
    Wang, Hongyan
    MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 145 : S62 - S62
  • [3] The role of polarized vesicle traffic during asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts
    Halbsgut, Nils
    Wodarz, Andreas
    MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 126 : S149 - S149
  • [4] The role of centrosomes and astral microtubules during asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts
    Giansanti, MG
    Gatti, M
    Bonaccorsi, S
    DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 128 (07): : 1137 - 1145
  • [5] Control of asymmetric cell division in developing Drosophila Neuroblasts
    Walden, Miriam
    Edwards, Thomas
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2011, 67 : C345 - C346
  • [6] Asymmetric cortical extension leads to asymmetric cell division in Drosophila neuroblasts
    Connell, Marisa
    Cabernard, Clemens
    Ricketson, Derek
    Doe, Chris Q.
    Prehoda, Kenneth E.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2012, 26
  • [7] Molecular control of cell polarity and asymmetric cell division in Drosophila neuroblasts
    Wodarz, A
    CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2005, 17 (05) : 475 - 481
  • [8] Rapsynoid/partner of inscuteable controls asymmetric division of larval neuroblasts in Drosophila
    Parmentier, ML
    Woods, D
    Greig, S
    Phan, PG
    Radovic, A
    Bryant, P
    O'Kane, CJ
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (14): : art. no. - RC84
  • [9] The interphase microtubule aster is a determinant of asymmetric division orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts
    Januschke, Jens
    Gonzalez, Cayetano
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2010, 188 (05): : 693 - 706
  • [10] Genetic screening for genes involved in asymmetric cell division of Drosophila neuroblasts
    Higashi-Takizawa, C
    Müller, HAJ
    Wodarz, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 82 : 81 - 82