Sibyl: Explaining Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision Making

被引:2
|
作者
Zytek, Alexandra [1 ]
Liu, Dongyu [1 ]
Vaithianathan, Rhema [2 ]
Veeramachaneni, Kalyan [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
machine learning; interpretability; explainability; child welfare; social good; tool;
D O I
10.1145/3411763.3451743
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As machine learning is applied to an increasingly large number of domains, the need for an effective way to explain its predictions grows apace. In the domain of child welfare screening, machine learning offers a promising method of consolidating the large amount of data that screeners must look at, potentially improving the outcomes for children reported to child welfare departments. Interviews and case-studies suggest that adding an explanation alongside the model prediction may result in better outcomes, but it is not obvious what kind of explanation would be most useful in this context. Through a series of interviews and user studies, we developed Sibyl, a machine learning explanation dashboard specifically designed to aid child welfare screeners' decision making. When testing Sibyl, we evaluated four different explanation types, and based on this evaluation, decided a local feature contribution approach was most useful to screeners.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] To kill or not to kill: A systematic literature review of high-stakes moral decision-making measures and their psychometric properties
    Ni, Benjamin Kai
    Burns, Bruce D.
    Mak, Karina K. L.
    Lah, Suncica
    Silva, Diego S.
    Goldwater, Micah B.
    Kleitman, Sabina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [42] Cognitive Biases in High-Stakes Decision-Making: Implications for Joint Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery Conference
    不详
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 46 (3) : 536 - 543
  • [43] Teachers' high-stakes decision making. How teaching approaches affect rational and intuitive data collection
    Vanlommel, Kristin
    Van Gasse, Roos
    Vanhoof, Jan
    Van Petegem, Peter
    TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2018, 71 : 108 - 119
  • [44] Comparing badges and learning goals in low- and high-stakes learning contexts
    Bradley J. Morris
    Colleen Dragovich
    Rachael Todaro
    Sebiha Balci
    Eve Dalton
    Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2019, 31 : 573 - 603
  • [45] Comparing badges and learning goals in low- and high-stakes learning contexts
    Morris, Bradley J.
    Dragovich, Colleen
    Todaro, Rachael
    Balci, Sebiha
    Dalton, Eve
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 31 (03) : 573 - 603
  • [46] Development of competency models for assessors and simulators in high-stakes selection processes
    Patterson, Fiona
    Zibarras, Lara
    Kerrin, Maire
    Lopes, Safiatu
    Price, Roger
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (12) : 1082 - 1085
  • [47] Measuring Team Hierarchy During High-Stakes Clinical Decision Making: Development and Validation of a New Behavioral Observation Method
    Johansson, Anna C.
    Manago, Bianca
    Sell, Jane
    Jackson, Cullen D.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2023, 98 (04) : 505 - 513
  • [48] Explaining Machine Learning: Adding Interactivity to Develop Decision-making Visualization Expectations
    Heleno, Marco
    Correia, Nuno
    Carvalhais, Miguel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL AND INTERACTIVE ARTS (ARTECH 2019), 2019,
  • [49] High-Stakes Decision-Making Within Complex Social Environments: A Computational Model of Belief Systems in the Arab Spring
    Dornschneider, Stephanie
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2019, 43 (07)
  • [50] THE INSTRUMENTAL MOTIVATION OF TEACHERS: IMPLICATIONS OF HIGH-STAKES ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
    Proudfoot, Kevin
    Boyd, Pete
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 72 (03) : 295 - 320