Comparison of the isolation and inhibition abilities of selective media used for Brucella spp. Isolation

被引:3
|
作者
Karagul, Mustafa Sencer [1 ]
Ikiz, Serkan [2 ]
机构
[1] Pendik Vet Control Inst, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Microbiol, Fac Vet Med, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES | 2017年 / 41卷 / 06期
关键词
Biovar; Brucella spp; contaminant inhibition; isolation; selective medium; MELITENSIS; ABORTUS; SHEEP; DIAGNOSIS; LISTERIA; GOATS;
D O I
10.3906/vet-1701-50
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare and contrast the isolation ability of selective media developed for Brucella spp. isolation and their inhibition ability against contaminant microorganisms. Fifty-one field strains biotyped from abortion case samples and 25 Brucella spp. negative organ samples were used. Strain suspensions and organ suspensions were prepared separately. The turbidity of the strain suspensions was measured via spectrophotometer. The bacterial density of the strain suspensions was prepared in such a way that the suspensions would have different turbidity values. Inoculation into Farrell, Agrifood Research and Technology Center of Aragon, Jones & Morgan, and Modified Thayer Martin media was performed simultaneously from a dilution of each strain suspension and organ suspension. It was incubated in a 37 degrees C, 5%-10% CO2 condition for 5-8 days. Brucella isolates were identified via a conventional biotyping method. The results of this study illustrate that selective media have isolation and cultivation ability for B. abortus biovar (bv) 3, B. abortus bv1, B. melitensis bv3, B. melitensis bv1, Rev1, and S-19 strains isolated from the field. There is more variation in the contaminant inhibition ability of the media compared to their isolation sensitivity. Farrell medium has 47 Brucella spp. isolations in 51 samples. It showed the highest performance with an isolation sensitivity of 92.1% and an inhibition ability of 80%. In this context, it might be suggested that researchers should initially use Farrell medium and, afterwards, use it simultaneously with another medium to be able to increase the isolation ability.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 786
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of two selective media for the isolation of Brucella melitensis from naturally infected sheep and goats
    Marin, CM
    deBagues, MPJ
    Barberan, M
    Blasco, JM
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1996, 138 (17) : 409 - 411
  • [22] Assessment of five culture media for the growth and isolation of Capnocytophaga spp.
    Caintar, M
    Spratt, DA
    Newman, HN
    Wilson, M
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2001, 7 (03) : 158 - 160
  • [23] Antibiotics in media for isolation of Campylobacter spp. do not enhance resistance
    Pumbwe, L
    Piddock, LJV
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 54 (05) : 961 - 962
  • [24] A new selective medium for isolation of Rhizoctonia spp. from soil
    Spurlock, T.
    Rothrock, C.
    Monfort, W.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S170 - S170
  • [25] Development of an Improved Selective and Differential Medium for Isolation of Salmonella spp.
    Park, Sang-Hyun
    Ryu, Sangryeol
    Kang, Dong-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (10) : 3222 - 3226
  • [26] Development of a selective differential agar for isolation and enumeration of Campylobacter spp.
    Line, JE
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2001, 64 (11) : 1711 - 1715
  • [27] Selective media for isolation of Brucella abortus strain RB51
    Hornsby, RL
    Jensen, AE
    Olsen, SC
    Thoen, CO
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [28] ISOLATION OF BRUCELLA SPP FROM CLINICAL SPECIMENS
    ETEMADI, H
    RAISSADAT, A
    PICKETT, MJ
    ZAFARI, Y
    VAHEDIFAR, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 20 (03) : 586 - 586
  • [29] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SELECTIVE MEDIA FOR ISOLATION OF CAMPYLOBACTERS
    HOLLER, C
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR BAKTERIOLOGIE MIKROBIOLOGIE UND HYGIENE SERIE B-UMWELTHYGIENE KRANKENHAUSHYGIENE ARBEITSHYGIENE PRAVENTIVE MEDIZIN, 1988, 186 (5-6): : 434 - 434
  • [30] Comparison of selective media for primary isolation of Campylobacters
    Abeyta, C
    Tenge, BJ
    Hunt, JM
    Trost, PA
    Bark, DH
    Kaysner, CA
    Wekell, MM
    CAMPYLOBACTERS, HELICOBACTERS, AND RELATED ORGANISMS, 1996, : 13 - 18