DATA-DRIVEN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING FOR SMART AND SUSTAINABLE MACHINING

被引:0
|
作者
Bhatia, Purvee [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Nagaraj, Sohan [1 ]
Achanta, Varshita [1 ]
Pulaparthi, Bharat [1 ]
Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Mech Engn, Smart & Sustainable Syst Lab S3 Lab, Tampa, FL USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE2021), VOL 2B | 2021年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a multi-criteria decision-making analysis of the alternatives for smart and sustainable machining processes to provide visibility and clarity on the factors that can affect production performance. Identification of such parameters can aid in the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies. The framework developed for decision making utilizes fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to compare alternative machining scenarios. Machining with Tool Condition Monitoring (TCM) and machining with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for modeling ambient conditions are analyzed for their application and form use cases in the framework. Feasibility of TCM via vibration analysis when milling 17-4 Stainless Steel is investigated and a positive trend is observed between the surface roughness of the work piece and the cutting tool vibration at time steps where tool wear is predicted. Thus, a viable low-cost solution for TCM is available. The ambient conditions of the machining environment have been modelled with CFD to study temperature and airflow gradients. The CFD model can be used to reduce thermal errors for precision machining and enhance operator efficiency. The result from the decision-making framework shows a clear preference for smart machining alternatives as compared to the conventional machining. In all, machining with TCM and CFD is found to be the most preferred.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A multi-stage multi-criteria hierarchical decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection
    Hendiani, Sepehr
    Mahmoudi, Amin
    Liao, Huchang
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 94
  • [42] Smart Cities and Big Data Analytics: A Data-Driven Decision-Making Use Case
    Osman, Ahmed M. Shahat
    Elragal, Ahmed
    SMART CITIES, 2021, 4 (01): : 286 - 313
  • [43] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [44] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [45] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Scheduling
    Saroja, S.
    Revathi, T.
    Auluck, Nitin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1399 - 1427
  • [46] A hybrid approach based on multi-criteria decision making and data-driven optimization in solving portfolio selection problem
    Doaei, Meysam
    Dehnad, Kazem
    Dehnad, Mahdi
    OPSEARCH, 2025, 62 (01) : 1 - 36
  • [47] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421
  • [48] A Model for Linguistic Dynamic Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Jiang, Le
    Liu, Hongbin
    Martinez, Luis
    Cai, Jianfeng
    FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2013), 2014, 277 : 939 - 949
  • [49] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482
  • [50] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304