Bayesian inversion of CSEM and magnetotelluric data

被引:1
|
作者
Buland, Arild [1 ,2 ]
Kolbjornsen, Odd [3 ]
机构
[1] STATOIL, N-4001 Stavanger, Norway
[2] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
[3] Norwegian Comp Ctr, Oslo, Norway
关键词
MARINE SEISMIC AVA; WAVELET ESTIMATION; ROCK-PHYSICS; 1D INVERSION; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; RESOLUTION; PROSPECT; FIELDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2010-0298.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We have developed a Bayesian methodology for inversion of controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) data and magnetotelluric (MT) data. The inversion method provided optimal solutions and also the associated uncertainty for any sets of electric and magnetic components and frequencies from CSEM and MT data. The method is based on a 1D forward modeling method for the electromagnetic (EM) response for a plane-layered anisotropic earth model. The inversion method was also designed to invert common midpoint (CMP)-sorted data along a 2D earth profile assuming locally horizontal models in each CMP position. The inversion procedure simulates from the posterior distribution using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) approach based on the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The method that we use integrates available geologic prior knowledge with the information in the electromagnetic data such that the prior model stabilizes and constrains the inversion according to the described knowledge. The synthetic examples demonstrated that inclusion of more data generally improves the inversion results. Compared to inversion of the inline electric component only, inclusion of broadside and magnetic components and an extended set of frequency components moderately decreased the uncertainty of the inversion. The results were strongly dependent on the prior knowledge imposed by the prior distribution. The prior knowledge about the background resistivity model surrounding the target was highly important for a successful and reliable inversion result.
引用
收藏
页码:E33 / E42
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Semiautomatic and Automatic Cooperative Inversion of Seismic and Magnetotelluric Data
    Le, Cuong V. A.
    Harris, Brett D.
    Pethick, Andrew M.
    Takougang, Eric M. Takam
    Howe, Brendan
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 37 (05) : 845 - 896
  • [32] A PRACTICAL METHOD FOR THE INVERSION OF MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA FOR A LAYERED EARTH
    RANKIN, D
    PASCAL, F
    GEOPHYSICS, 1983, 48 (06) : 736 - 744
  • [33] DIRECT INVERSION OF ONE-DIMENSIONAL MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA
    COEN, S
    QUERCIA, F
    MACKIEWICZ, M
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 88 (NB3): : 2407 - 2412
  • [34] INVERSION OF MAGNETOTELLURIC DATA USING LOCALIZED CONDUCTIVITY CONSTRAINTS
    WHITTALL, KP
    GEOPHYSICS, 1986, 51 (08) : 1603 - 1607
  • [35] The Applications of an Adaptive Regularized Inversion Algorithm for Magnetotelluric Data
    Zheng Yanfeng
    Zhao Xiaoliang
    Zhang Long
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING (ICM3E 2016), 2016, : 316 - 319
  • [36] Inversion of magnetotelluric data in the presence of strong bathymetry/topography
    Li, Shenghui
    Booker, John R.
    Aprea, Claudia
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2008, 56 (02) : 259 - 268
  • [37] Optimal selection of regularization parameter in magnetotelluric data inversion
    Zainalpour, Aref
    Kamali, Gholamreza
    Moradzadeh, Ali
    ACTA GEODAETICA ET GEOPHYSICA, 2022, 57 (02) : 245 - 263
  • [38] Immune Algorithm and its application to magnetotelluric data inversion
    Yang, Guoshi
    Shi, Xueming
    Luo, Hongming
    Fan, Jianke
    Xiao, Min
    Zhang, Xuhui
    PROGRESS IN INTELLIGENCE COMPUTATION AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 708 - 711
  • [39] Reservoir-parameter identification using minimum relative entropy-based Bayesian inversion of seismic AVA and marine CSEM data
    Hou, Zhangshuan
    Rubin, Yoram
    Hoversten, G. Michael
    Vasco, Don
    Chen, Jinsong
    GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (06) : O77 - O88
  • [40] 3D Inversion-Based Interpretation of Marine CSEM Data
    Zach, J. J.
    Frenkel, M. A.
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2012, 15 (03) : 321 - 334