Prevention of anesthesia-induced injection pain of propofol in pediatric anesthesia

被引:16
|
作者
Cheng, Dabin [1 ]
Liu, Lu [1 ]
Hu, Zheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 72 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Injection pain; Lidocaine; Ketamine; Propofol; CHILDREN; SEDATION; FENTANYL; SURGERY; REMIFENTANIL; COMBINATIONS; MANAGEMENT; DESFLURANE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.12669/pjms.333.12026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Propofol is a new anesthetic agent in clinical practice, but randomized double-blinded prospective studies on its role in pediatric anesthesia remain limited. We aimed to compare the preventive effects of pre-injected lidocaine or ketamine and its pre-mixture on the anesthesia-induced injection pain of propofol using a randomized double-blinded prospective method, and to compare the outcomes with those of medium-/long-chain propofol (M/LCT). Methods: A total of 360 pediatric patients (aged 5-12 years old) who received elective surgery were randomly divided into six groups (n = 60) as follows. S group: control group; L group: lidocaine group; L + P group: lidocaine + propofol group; K group: ketamine group; K + P group: ketamine + propofol group; M group: M/LCT group. After the drug fluid completely entered the cubital vein, the venous access was closed. During propofol injection, the injection pain was scored using the VRS 4-point scale. Meanwhile, the heart rates before and during injection were recorded, the adverse reactions during and after injection were observed, and the incidence rate and degree of pain were evaluated. Results: The VRS 4-point scale showed that the incidence rates of injection pain of S group, L group, L + P group, K group, K + P group and M group were 78.3%, 66.67%, 51.66%, 43.33%, 48.33% and 45% respectively. The incidence rates of injection pain of all experimental groups were significantly lower than that of S group (P<0.01). The incidence rates of injection pain of L + P group, K group, K + P group and M group were significantly lower than that of L group (P<0.05). The differences among the other groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Intravenous pre-injection of lidocaine, ketamine or those mixed with propofol can all significantly reduce the incidence rate of injection pain of propofol.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 756
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anesthesia-induced epilepsy: causes and treatment
    Zhao, Xiaojuan
    Wang, Xuefeng
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2014, 14 (09) : 1099 - 1113
  • [22] Avoiding topical anesthesia-induced methemoglobinemia
    Wong, DH
    Wilson, SE
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2005, 15 (07) : 1088 - 1088
  • [23] INTRAVENOUS CALCITONIN ALLEVIATES SPINAL ANESTHESIA-INDUCED PHANTOM LIMB PAIN
    FIDDLER, DS
    HINDMAN, BJ
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 74 (01) : 187 - 189
  • [24] Controversies in anesthesia-induced developmental neurotoxicity
    Useinovic, Nemanja
    Jevtovic-Todorovic, Vesna
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [25] Exophthalmos in rats - Anesthesia-induced exophthalmos
    Smith, Sophie E.
    Grieve, Kenneth L.
    LAB ANIMAL, 2008, 37 (06) : 247 - 249
  • [26] Anesthesia-induced acute hyperglycemia in rodents
    Saha, JK
    Xia, JQ
    Grondin, J
    Engle, SK
    Jakubowski, JA
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2004, 18 (04): : A578 - A578
  • [27] Avoiding Topical Anesthesia-Induced Methemoglobinemia
    David H Wong
    Samuel E Wilson
    Obesity Surgery, 2005, 15 : 1088 - 1088
  • [28] Reduced pain on injection with a 0.5% propofol emulsion during induction of anesthesia
    Soltesz, Stefan
    Diekmann, Markus
    Mitrenga-Theusinger, Anja
    Keilen, Matthias
    Molter, Gerd P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 162 - 163
  • [29] RATE OF INJECTION OF PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA
    GOODMAN, NW
    BLACK, AMS
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (06): : 938 - 939
  • [30] Spinal anesthesia-induced sedation may obviously facilitate general anesthesia
    Gentili, Marc E.
    Enel, Dominique
    Bonnet, Francis J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2011, 23 (01) : 79 - 79