Evaluation of the predictability of real-time crash risk models

被引:21
|
作者
Xu, Chengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Jiangsu Key Lab Urban ITS, Si Pai Lou 2, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Modern Urban, Si Pai Lou 2, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crash risk; Predictability; Real-time crash risk modeling; Predictive performance; Freeways; TRAFFIC CONDITIONS; SAFETY; WEATHER; IMPACTS; SPEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.004
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The primary objective of the present study was to investigate the predictability of crash risk models that were developed using high-resolution real-time traffic data. More specifically the present study sought answers to the following questions: (a) how to evaluate the predictability of a real-time crash risk model; and (b) how to improve the predictability of a real-time crash risk model. The predictability is defined as the crash probability given the crash precursor identified by the crash risk model. An equation was derived based on the Bayes' theorem for estimating approximately the predictability of crash risk models. The estimated predictability was then used to quantitatively evaluate the effects of the threshold of crash precursors, the matched and unmatched case-control design, and the control-to-case ratio on the predictability of crash risk models. It was found that: (a) the predictability of a crash risk model can be measured as the product of prior crash probability and the ratio between sensitivity and false alarm rate; (b) there is a trade-off between the predictability and sensitivity of a real-time crash risk model; (c) for a given level of sensitivity, the predictability of the crash risk model that is developed using the unmatched case-controlled sample is always better than that of the model developed using the matched case-controlled sample; and (d) when the control-to-case ratio is beyond 4:1, the increase in control-to-case ratio does not lead to clear improvements in predictability. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 215
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictability study of hard real-time distributed systems
    Mao, Yugang
    Jin, Shiyao
    Zhang, Yongjun
    Hu, Huaping
    2000, Sci Press (37):
  • [42] On predictability and optimization of multiprogrammed caches for real-time applications
    Shahrier, SM
    Liu, JC
    1977 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE, COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, 1997, : 17 - 25
  • [43] Real-time crash prediction for expressway weaving segments
    Wang, Ling
    Abdel-Aty, Mohamed
    Shi, Qi
    Park, Juneyoung
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 61 : 1 - 10
  • [44] The importance of flow composition in real-time crash prediction
    Basso, Franco
    Basso, Leonardo J.
    Pezoa, Raul
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 137
  • [45] Development of a Real-Time Crash Risk Prediction Model Incorporating the Various Crash Mechanisms Across Different Traffic States
    Xu, Chengcheng
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Pan
    Zhang, Fangwei
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2015, 16 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [46] Deadlock Risk Assessment in Architectural Models of Real-Time Systems
    Monzon, Antonio
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Jose L.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, 2009, : 181 - +
  • [47] Real-time crash prediction models: State-of-the-art, design pathways and ubiquitous requirements
    Hossain, Moinul
    Abdel-Aty, Mohamed
    Quddus, Mohammed A.
    Muromachi, Yasunori
    Sadeek, Soumik Nafis
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2019, 124 : 66 - 84
  • [48] Real-time forecast evaluation of DSGE models with stochastic volatility
    Diebold, Francis X.
    Schorfheide, Frank
    Shin, Minchul
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2017, 201 (02) : 322 - 332
  • [49] Evaluation of Deep Models for Real-Time Small Object Detection
    Phuoc Pham
    Duy Nguyen
    Tien Do
    Thanh Duc Ngo
    Duy-Dinh Le
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICONIP 2017), PT III, 2017, 10636 : 516 - 526
  • [50] SCHEDULING IN REAL-TIME MODELS
    KURKISUONIO, R
    SYSTA, K
    VAIN, J
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1991, 571 : 327 - 339