The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients

被引:75
|
作者
Hawker, G
Ridout, R
Ricupero, M
Jaglal, S
Bogoch, E
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Med,Div Rheumatol, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Osteoporosis Res Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Rehabil Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Mobil Program, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Womens Coll Ambulatory Care Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evalut, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
关键词
fracture clinic intervention; fragility fractures; osteoporosis; pre-post study;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-003-1377-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We examined the effect of a fracture clinic intervention in reducing previously documented undertreatment of osteoporosis (OP) in individuals with fragility fractures. Fragility fracture patients presenting to five community fracture clinics with no prior diagnosis of, or treatment for OP, and whose radiographic appearance was consistent with fragility fracture, were included. These individuals (intervention group) were informed of their OP risk, and advised to follow up with their physician for assessment. A standardized letter, intended for the physician and outlining the same was provided. Three months later, a telephone interview determined whether a physician visit had occurred, and if so, what investigation and treatment recommendations were made. These outcomes were compared with those for an equal number of age- and sex-matched fragility fracture 'controls,' selected from among fracture clinic attendees in the 6-9 months preceding the intervention. Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of having received the intervention on physician follow-up, bone density testing, and OP treatment recommendations. The mean age of the 278 participants (139 per group) was 66.0 years; 74% were female. Adjusting for age, sex, hospital, and perceived diagnosis of OP, those who received the intervention were more likely to follow up with a physician (adjusted OR 1.85, p=0.02) and to be recommended bone density testing (adjusted OR 5.22, p<0.0001), but were not more likely to receive an OP treatment recommendation (adjusted OR 2.07, p=0.07). It is concluded that a simple fracture clinic intervention increased follow-up and investigation, but not treatment for OP, in fragility fracture patients. Individuals recommended treatment for OP were more likely to perceive themselves as having OP and to have had a previous fragility fracture. Our findings suggest that future interventions should incorporate assessment of patients' OP health beliefs and education about risk factors for fracture, and should be coupled with physician education to achieve optimal results.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis is an Indicator Fracture of Osteoporosis
    Rommens, P. M.
    Drees, P.
    Thomczyk, S.
    Betz, U.
    Wagner, D.
    Hofmann, A.
    OSTEOLOGIE, 2018, 27 (03) : 144 - 153
  • [22] The yawning gap between osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after a fragility fracture in Mexico
    Macias-Hernandez, Salvador Israel
    Degollado-Rodriguez, Miriam Macarena
    Maldonado-Sanchez, Horacio
    de Leon, Andrea Olascoaga-Gomez
    Coronado-Zarco, Roberto
    Nava-Bringas, Tania Ines
    Ramirez-Perez, Esperanza
    Cruz-Medina, Eva
    Espinosa-Morales, Rolando
    Morones-Alba, Juan Daniel
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [23] The yawning gap between osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after a fragility fracture in Mexico
    Salvador Israel Macías-Hernández
    Miriam Macarena Degollado-Rodríguez
    Horacio Maldonado-Sánchez
    Andrea Olascoaga-Gómez de León
    Roberto Coronado-Zarco
    Tania Inés Nava-Bringas
    Esperanza Ramírez-Pérez
    Eva Cruz-Medina
    Rolando Espinosa-Morales
    Juan Daniel Morones-Alba
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2021, 16
  • [24] Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review
    V. Elliot-Gibson
    E. R. Bogoch
    S. A. Jamal
    D. E. Beaton
    Osteoporosis International, 2004, 15 : 767 - 778
  • [25] Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review
    Elliot-Gibson, V
    Bogoch, ER
    Jamal, SA
    Beaton, DE
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 (10) : 767 - 778
  • [26] Impact of an Outpatient Fracture Liaison Service on Osteoporosis Evaluation Among Patients With Upper Extremity Fragility Fracture
    Seyok, Thany
    Collins, Jamie E.
    Erikson, Samantha J.
    Charles, Julia F.
    Earp, Brandon E.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (02): : 256 - 262
  • [27] Optimizing Osteoporosis Intervention Post Fragility Fracture in Subacute Rehab
    Sathiraju, K.
    Gavaller, M. D.
    Oh, H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 : S87 - S88
  • [28] Longitudinal analysis of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fracture patients
    Simonelli, C
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 : S144 - S145
  • [29] SARCOPENIA, OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRAGILITY FRACTURE
    Masri, B. K.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 : 660 - 660
  • [30] Factors influencing the treatment of osteoporosis following fragility fracture
    Bessette, L.
    Jean, S.
    Davison, K. S.
    Roy, S.
    Ste-Marie, L. -G.
    Brown, J. P.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 (11) : 1911 - 1919