Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China

被引:102
|
作者
Zhang, Weike [1 ]
Luo, Qian [1 ]
Liu, Shiyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Government regulation; Corporate environmental performance (CEP); New Ambient Air Quality Standard (new AAQS); DID; AIR-QUALITY; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; GREEN INNOVATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENFORCEMENT; IMPACT; UNCERTAINTY; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Due to the severe air pollution, the Chinese state issued the new Ambient Air Quality Standard (hereafter new AAQS) in 2012, which requires local governments to control pollution and improve air quality. As such, we take that practice as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the effect of government regulation on corporate environmental performance (CEP). We employ the difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct an empirical investigation using Chinese listed enterprises' data from 2008 to 2018. Our findings indicate that the new AAQS significantly promotes the improvement of CEP. However, for enterprises in provinces with less environmental regulatory enforcement and poor environmental information transparency, this effect is weakened. Besides, the influence of the new AAQS reduces when the enterprises are regulated by the government at a greater administrative hierarchical distance to the central state. Our findings offer some critical implications for developing countries to implement government regulation. (C) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 121
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of environmental regulation on corporate financial performance: an empirical study from China
    Bao, Xiyi
    Yu, Binbin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (12) : 15003 - 15023
  • [32] Dual performance of environmental regulation on economic and environmental development: evidence from China
    Li, Chunmei
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    He, Ge
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (02) : 3116 - 3130
  • [33] Dual performance of environmental regulation on economic and environmental development: evidence from China
    Chunmei Li
    Abbas Ali Chandio
    Ge He
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 3116 - 3130
  • [34] The impact of environmental regulation on corporate financial performance: an empirical study from China
    Xiyi Bao
    Binbin Yu
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 15003 - 15023
  • [35] Corporate governance and corporate environmental investments: Evidence from China
    Li, Qiang
    Ruan, Wenjuan
    Sun, Tiantian
    Xiang, Erwei
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 31 (06) : 923 - 942
  • [36] Environmental Regulation and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Chinese Carbon Emission Trading Pilot
    Zheng, Lei
    Omori, Akira
    Cao, Jin
    Guo, Xuemeng
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [37] Local government debt pressure and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from China
    Nie, Song
    Liu, Junxian
    Zeng, Gang
    You, Jiyuan
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [38] Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China
    Sun, Hongfeng
    Liu, Chang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02)
  • [39] Capital market opening and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China
    Zhang, Rongwu
    Fu, Wenqiang
    Lu, Tong
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 53
  • [40] Network infrastructure and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from "Broadband China"
    He, Wenjian
    Wang, Xiaodong
    Miao, Miao
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 131