Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human-Robot Teams

被引:154
|
作者
de Visser, Ewart J. [1 ]
Peeters, Marieke M. M. [4 ]
Jung, Malte F. [6 ]
Kohn, Spencer [3 ]
Shaw, Tyler H. [3 ]
Pak, Richard [2 ]
Neerincx, Mark A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force Acad, Warfighter Effectiveness Res Ctr, 2354 Fairchild Dr Suite 5L-50, Colorado Springs, CO 80840 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Psychol, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] George Mason Univ, 4400 Univ Dr 3F5, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[4] TNO Perceptual & Cognit Syst, Kampweg 55, NL-3769 DE Soesterberg, Netherlands
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[6] Cornell Univ, Dept Informat Sci, Gates Hall 220A, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Relationship equity; Social autonomy; Trust repair; Trust calibration; Work agreements; Agents; Social abilities; Human-robot interaction; Collaboration; Team; HUMAN-LIKE APPEARANCE; AGENT TRANSPARENCY; AUTOMATION BIAS; DECISION AIDS; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; EMOTION; MODEL; CONNECTIVITY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The introduction of artificial teammates in the form of autonomous social robots, with fewer social abilities compared to humans, presents new challenges for human-robot team dynamics. A key characteristic of high performing human-only teams is their ability to establish, develop, and calibrate trust over long periods of time, making the establishment of longitudinal human-robot team trust calibration a crucial part of these challenges. This paper presents a novel integrative model that takes a longitudinal perspective on trust development and calibration in human-robot teams. A key new proposed factor in this model is the introduction of the concept relationship equity. Relationship equity is an emotional resource that predicts the degree of goodwill between two actors. Relationship equity can help predict the future health of a long-term relationship. Our model is descriptive of current trust dynamics, predictive of the impact on trust of interactions within a human-robot team, and prescriptive with respect to the types of interventions and transparency methods promoting trust calibration. We describe the interplay between team trust dynamics and the establishment of work agreements that guide and improve human-robot collaboration. Furthermore, we introduce methods for dampening (reducing overtrust) and repairing (reducing undertrust) mis-calibrated trust between team members as well as methods for transparency and explanation. We conclude with a description of the implications of our model and a research agenda to jump-start a new comprehensive research program in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 478
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Planning with Trust for Human-Robot Collaboration
    Chen, Min
    Nikolaidis, Stefanos
    Soh, Harold
    Hsu, David
    Srinivasa, Siddhartha
    [J]. HRI '18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, 2018, : 307 - 315
  • [32] Trust, but Verify: Autonomous Robot Trust Modeling in Human-Robot Collaboration
    Alhaji, Basel
    Prilla, Michael
    Rausch, Andreas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION HUMAN-AGENT INTERACTION, HAI 2021, 2021, : 402 - 406
  • [33] Influencing Leading and Following in Human-Robot Teams
    Kwon, Minae
    Li, Mengxi
    Bucquet, Alexandre
    Sadigh, Dorsa
    [J]. ROBOTICS: SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS XV, 2019,
  • [34] Influencing leading and following in human-robot teams
    Li, Mengxi
    Kwon, Minae
    Sadigh, Dorsa
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2021, 45 (07) : 959 - 978
  • [35] Unfair! Perceptions of Fairness in Human-Robot Teams
    Chang, Mai Lee
    Trafton, Greg
    McCurry, J. Malcolm
    Thomaz, Andrea Lockerd
    [J]. 2021 30TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2021, : 905 - 912
  • [36] Robust Execution of Plans for Human-Robot Teams
    Karpas, Erez
    Levine, Steven J.
    Yu, Peng
    Williams, Brian C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED PLANNING AND SCHEDULING, 2015, : 342 - 346
  • [37] Collaborative Planning and Negotiation in Human-Robot Teams
    Chang, Christine T.
    Hebert, Mitchell
    Hayes, Bradley
    [J]. COMPANION OF THE ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2023, 2023, : 763 - 765
  • [38] Towards Modeling Real-Time Trust in Asymmetric Human-Robot Collaborations
    Xu, Anqi
    Dudek, Gregory
    [J]. ROBOTICS RESEARCH, ISRR, 2016, 114 : 113 - 129
  • [39] Team robot identification theory (TRIT): robot attractiveness and team identification on performance and viability in human-robot teams
    You, Sangseok
    Robert, Lionel P., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2022, 78 (18): : 19684 - 19706
  • [40] Physical Collaboration of Human-Human and Human-Robot Teams
    Reed, Kyle B.
    Peshkin, Michael A.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2008, 1 (02) : 108 - 120