F-18 FDG PET in detecting renal cell carcinoma

被引:27
|
作者
Ak, I [1 ]
Can, C
机构
[1] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Nucl Med, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
coincidence PET; F-18FDG; renal cell carcinoma;
D O I
10.1080/02841850500335002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the role of F-18 FDG imaging with a dual head coincidence mode gamma camera (Co-PET) in the detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with renal masses. Material and Methods: An F-18 FDG Co-PET study was performed in 19 patients (7 F, 12 M; mean age 58.15 +/- 2.5 years, age range 45-79 years) with suspected primary renal tumors based on conventional imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) before nephrectomy or surgical resection of the mass. Results: Histologically documented RCC was present in 15 patients. Of the 19 patients with suspected primary renal tumors, F-18 FDG Co-PET was true-positive in 13, false-negative in 2, true-negative in 3, and false-positive in I patient. Two angiomyolipomas and one renal mass due to infarction and hemorrhage showed a true-negative Co-PET result. The patient with false-positive FDG Co-PET study was diagnosed as xantogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG Co-PET for RCC were 86% (13/15), 75% (3/4), and 84% (16/19), respectively. Positive predictive value for RCC was 92% and negative predictive value 60%. Conclusion: These findings suggest that F-18 FDG Co-PET may have a role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with RCC and primary staging of disease. Positive F-18 FDG study may be predictive of the presence of RCC. However, a negative study does not exclude the RCC.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 899
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dual Time F-18 FDG PET/CT Imaging in the Diagnosis of Renal Cell Cancer
    Karyagar, Savas
    Koc, Zehra Pinar
    Karyagar, Sevda S.
    Ozulker, Tamer
    Topal, Cevat
    Karaguzel, Ersagun
    Balci, Tansel Ansal
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2014, 10 (02) : 134 - 139
  • [32] Myelofibrosis on F-18 FDG PET imaging
    Burrell, SC
    Fischman, AJ
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (10) : 674 - 674
  • [33] Nodular Fasciitis on F-18 FDG PET
    Gotthardt, Martin
    Arens, Anne
    van der Heijden, Erik
    de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (10) : 830 - 831
  • [34] Role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in restaging of patients with renal cell carcinoma: experience at a single tertiary care centre
    Jois, Abhiram
    Kumar, Rajender
    Sood, Apurva
    Bhattacharya, Anish
    Singh, Shrawan
    Mittal, Bhagwant
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57
  • [35] Lack of Concordance Between the F-18 Fluoromisonidazole PET and the F-18 FDG PET in Human Glioblastoma
    De Clermont, Henri
    Huchet, Aymeri
    Lamare, Frederic
    Riviere, Annalisa
    Fernandez, Philippe
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (12) : E194 - E195
  • [36] Prognostic Value of Volumetric and Textural Parameters measured by Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Hwang, Jae Pil
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [37] Utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in synovial cell sarcoma
    Rayamajhi, Sampanna
    Reddy, Arun
    Agrawal, Kanhaiyalal
    Jain, Tarun
    Phulsunga, Rohit
    Bhattacharya, Anish
    Mittal, Bhagwant
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [38] Pneumo-renal sarcoidosis revealed by F-18 FDG PET/CT
    Lambert, Michel
    Hermoye, Aurelie
    Lhommel, Renaud
    CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2010, 3 (06): : 590 - 591
  • [39] F-18 FDG PET/CT Imaging of a Leydig Cell Tumor
    Lee, Gilho
    Lee, Jai Hyuen
    Lee, Won Ae
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (03) : 202 - 204
  • [40] The Role of F-18 FDG PET-CT for Detecting Second Primary Neoplasms
    Abdulrezzak, U.
    Orhan, E.
    Tutus, A.
    Kula, M.
    Berk, V.
    Karaca, H.
    Gundog, M.
    Eroglu, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 39 : S592 - S592