Bone Fragment Resorption and Clinical Outcomes of Traumatic Bony Bankart Lesion Treated With Arthroscopic Repair Versus Open Latarjet

被引:6
|
作者
Di Giacomo, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Pugliese, Mattia [1 ,3 ]
Peebles, Annalise M. [1 ,4 ]
Provencher, Matthew T. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Hosp Special Surg, Rome, Italy
[2] Concordia Hosp, Rome, Italy
[3] Osped Maggiore, Milan, Italy
[4] Steadman Philippon Res Inst, Vail, CO USA
[5] Steadman Clin, Vail, CO 81657 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2022年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词
shoulder instability; bony Bankart lesion; Latarjet; bone loss; ANTERIOR SHOULDER DISLOCATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RISK-FACTORS; INSTABILITY; RECURRENCE; OSTEOLYSIS; MANAGEMENT; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/03635465221076841
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Bony Bankart lesions can perpetuate chronic anterior glenohumeral instability. When surgical treatment is pursued, several factors need to be considered to obtain optimal outcomes. Purpose: To (1) quantitatively describe patterns of bone fragment resorption and associated risk factors for developing glenoid bone loss (GBL) and (2) to compare clinical and radiological results of attritional bone loss treated with either the arthroscopic Bankart or the open Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization (group A1, 10%-20% GBL; group A2, >20% GBL) or open Latarjet (group B, >10% GBL) for recurrent shoulder instability with bony Bankart lesion. Patient characteristics, number of dislocations, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores were obtained. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging was used to quantitatively describe patterns of bone fragment resorption. Results: A total of 120 consecutive patients (group A1, 40; group A2, 23; group B, 57) were included in the study, with a mean age of 25.6 years (range, 19-35 years). The average follow-up was 5.0 years for all groups (range, 4.83-5.16 years in group A1, 4.58-5.41 years in group A2, and 4.33-5.67 years in group B). The mean times between dislocation event and surgery were 12.8 months (range, 6-32 months) and 13.6 months (range, 6-38 months) for groups A and B, respectively. Redislocation rates were 7.5% in group A1 versus 13.0% in group A2, and only occurred in patients with >= 13.5% GBL. There were no redislocations for group B (0%). Patients had better WOSI scores in group B (234.1 +/- 126.9) than in group A (576.1 +/- 224.6) (P < .0001). In group A, smaller preoperative bone fragment size displayed a higher percentage of resorption after surgery (r = -0.64; P < .05). Conclusion: A significant inverse relationship exists between preoperative bone fragment size and percentage of postoperative resorption. Patients treated with arthroscopic bony Bankart repair who had final GBL >= 13.5% had worse outcomes. When planned GBL approaches 13.5% in high-demand patients, a smaller fragment size can result in worse clinical outcomes because of resorption. In these cases, choosing the open Latarjet procedure leads to better clinical results.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1343
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Comparison of clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: An observational study
    Tosyali, Hakan Koray
    Kaya, Hueseyin
    Hancioglu, Sertan
    Tamsel, Ipek
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Tekustun, Ferit
    Kayikci, Kayahan
    Kucuk, Levent
    Ozalp, Tackin
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (22) : E38181
  • [42] Long-term outcomes after repair of recurrent post-traumatic anterior shoulder instability: comparison of arthroscopic transglenoid suture and open Bankart reconstruction
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani
    Giordano, Giovanni
    Bonanzinga, Tommaso
    Grassi, Alberto
    Nitri, Marco
    Bruni, Danilo
    Ravazzolo, Giovanni
    Marcacci, Maurilio
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (05) : 816 - 821
  • [43] Mini-open versus all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair:: Comparison of the operative costs and the clinical outcomes
    Kose, Kamil Cagri
    Tezen, Engin
    Cebesoy, Oguz
    Karadeniz, Engin
    Guner, Dervis
    Adiyaman, Sinan
    Demirtas, Mehmet
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2008, 25 (03) : 249 - 259
  • [44] Mini-open versus all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Comparison of the operative costs and the clinical outcomes
    Kamil Çağri Köse
    Engin Tezen
    Oğuz Cebesoy
    Engin Karadeniz
    Dervis Guner
    Sinan Adiyaman
    Mehmet Demirtas
    Advances in Therapy, 2008, 25 : 249 - 259
  • [45] Comparison of clinical outcomes in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of rotator cuff tears A randomized clinical trial
    Liu, Jin
    Fan, Lin
    Zhu, Yingbo
    Yu, Haotong
    Xu, Tianyang
    Li, Guodong
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (11)
  • [46] Similar outcomes in collision athletes with subcritical glenoid bone loss and on-Track Hill Sachs lesion versus off-track Hill Sachs lesion managed with open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift
    Bitar, Ivan Jose
    Marangoni, Lucas Daniel
    Bustos, Damian Gabriel
    Pezzutti, Luciano
    Bitar, Lucia Belen
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (07) : 3083 - 3090
  • [47] A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair
    An, Vincent Vinh Gia
    Sivakumar, Brahman Shankar
    Phan, Kevin
    Trantalis, John
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (05) : 853 - 863
  • [48] Revision Arthroscopic Labral Repair Using All-Suture Anchors in Patients With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss After Failed Bankart Repair: Clinical Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up
    Lee, Jae-Hoo
    Shin, Sang-Jin
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [49] All-Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open Repair of Small to Large Sized Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes
    Shan, Liancheng
    Fu, Dong
    Chen, Kai
    Cai, Zhengdong
    Li, Guodong
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):