Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer

被引:178
|
作者
Endreseth, BH [1 ]
Myrvold, HE
Romundstad, P
Hestvik, UE
Bjerkeset, T
Wibe, A
机构
[1] Univ Trondheim, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Surg, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Trondheim, Inst Publ Hlth, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Levanger Hosp, Dept Surg, Levanger, Norway
关键词
early rectal cancer; transanal excision; major surgery; local recurrence; survival;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-005-0044-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The purpose of this national study was to examine the long-term results of transanal excision compared with major surgery of T1 rectal cancer. METHODS: This prospective study from the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Project included all 291 patients with a T1MO tumor within 15 cm from the anal verge treated by anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, Hartmann's procedure, or transanal excision in the period from November 1993 to December 1999. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six patients were treated by major surgery and 35 patients by transanal excision. None of the patients had neoadjuvant therapy. Macroscopic tumor remnants (R2) occurred in 17 percent (6/35) of the transanal excisions, while major surgery obtained 100 percent R0 resections. Eleven percent of the patients treated with major surgery had glandular involvement. There were no significant differences according to tumor localization, size, or differentiation between Stage I and Stage III tumors. Patients treated with transanal excision were older than patients having major surgery (mean age, 77 vs. 68 years, P < 0.001). After curative resection (R0, R1, Rx) the five-year rate of local recurrence was 12 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0-24) in the transanal excision group compared with 6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 2-10) after major surgery (P = 0.010). The overall five-year survival was 70 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 52-88) in the transanal excision group compared with 80 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 74-85) in the major surgery group (P = 0.04) and the five-year disease-free survival was 64 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 46-82) in the transanal excision group compared with 77 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 71-83) in the major surgery group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The main problem of transanal excision for early rectal cancer in the present study was the inability to remove all the malignancy. Patients treated with transanal excision had significantly higher rates of local recurrence compared with patients who underwent major surgery. Patients who had transanal excision had inferior survival, but they were older than those who had major surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1388
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Local excision of stratified T1 rectal cancer - Discussion
    Senagore, AJ
    Wirsing, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 191 (03): : 412 - 412
  • [32] Long-term Transanal Excision Outcomes in Patients With T1 Rectal Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Radical Resection
    Hwang, Yunghuyn
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Bong, Jun Woo
    Choi, Hye Yun
    Song, In Ho
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Park, In Ja
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 194 - 201
  • [33] Comparison of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of T1 Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Lu, Jun-Yang
    Lin, Guo-Le
    Qiu, Hui-Zhong
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Bin
    Zhou, Jiao-Lin
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [34] Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosa dissection in the treatment of rectal adenomas and T1 rectal cancer
    Baral, J.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2018, 40 (05) : 364 - 372
  • [35] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer
    Y. Ikeda
    N. Koyanagi
    M. Mori
    K. Akahoshi
    T. Ueyama
    K. Sugimachi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 1999, 13 : 710 - 712
  • [36] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal cancer in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer
    Ikeda, Y
    Koyanagi, N
    Mori, M
    Akahoshi, K
    Ueyama, T
    Sugimachi, K
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (07): : 710 - 712
  • [37] Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection vs. transanal total mesorectal excision in overweight patients with low rectal cancer
    Li, Zhengbiao
    Wang, Qi
    Feng, Qingbo
    Wang, Xingqin
    Xu, Fujian
    Xie, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [38] TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY COMBINED WITH ENDOSCOPIC POSTERIOR MESORECTUM EXCISION IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH T1 RECTAL CANCER: OWN RESULTS
    Walega, P.
    Kenig, J.
    Richter, P.
    Nowak, W.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 108 - 109
  • [39] Local Excision of T1 Rectal Cancer: Where Are We Now?
    Friel, Charles M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (09) : 1231 - 1233
  • [40] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention
    De Graaf, E. J. R.
    Doornebosch, P. G.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    Kranenbarg, E. Meershoek-Klein
    de Boer, A. C.
    Bekkering, F. C.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    EJSO, 2009, 35 (12): : 1280 - 1285