共 50 条
DNA damage in cumulus cells generated after the vitrification of in vitro matured porcine oocytes and its impact on fertilization and embryo development
被引:8
|作者:
Lopez, Alma
[1
,2
]
Betancourt, Miguel
[2
]
Ducolomb, Yvonne
[2
]
Jose Rodriguez, Juan
[3
]
Casas, Eduardo
[2
]
Bonilla, Edmundo
[2
]
Bahena, Ivan
[2
]
Retana-Marquez, Socorro
[4
]
Juarez-Rojas, Lizbeth
[4
]
Casillas, Fahiel
[4
]
机构:
[1] Metropolitan Autonomous Univ, Biol & Hlth Sci Program, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Metropolitan Autonomous Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Iztapalapa Campus, Mexico City 09340, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Genet & Environm Toxicol Res Unit, FES Zaragoza UMIEZ Campus 2, Mexico City 09230, DF, Mexico
[4] Metropolitan Autonomous Univ, Dept Biol Reprod, Iztapalapa Campus,Av San Rafael Atlixco 186, Mexico City 09340, DF, Mexico
关键词:
Vitrification;
Matured oocytes;
Cumulus cells;
DNA damage;
Cryoprotectants;
Porcine;
IMMATURE OOCYTES;
MOUSE OOCYTES;
COMET ASSAY;
PERMEATING CRYOPROTECTANTS;
GENE-EXPRESSION;
MATURATION;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
CONFIGURATION;
COMPETENCE;
COCULTURE;
D O I:
10.1186/s40813-021-00235-w
中图分类号:
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号:
0906 ;
摘要:
Background The evaluation of the DNA damage generated in cumulus cells after mature cumulus-oocyte complexes vitrification can be considered as an indicator of oocyte quality since these cells play important roles in oocyte developmental competence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine if matured cumulus-oocyte complexes exposure to cryoprotectants (CPAs) or vitrification affects oocytes and cumulus cells viability, but also if DNA damage is generated in cumulus cells, affecting fertilization and embryo development. Results The DNA damage in cumulus cells was measured using the alkaline comet assay and expressed as Comet Tail Length (CTL) and Olive Tail Moment (OTM). Results demonstrate that oocyte exposure to CPAs or vitrification reduced oocyte (75.5 +/- 3.69%, Toxicity; 66.7 +/- 4.57%, Vitrification) and cumulus cells viability (32.7 +/- 5.85%, Toxicity; 7.7 +/- 2.21%, Vitrification) compared to control (95.5 +/- 4.04%, oocytes; 89 +/- 4.24%, cumulus cells). Also, significantly higher DNA damage expressed as OTM was generated in the cumulus cells after exposure to CPAs and vitrification (39 +/- 17.41, 33.6 +/- 16.69, respectively) compared to control (7.4 +/- 4.22). In addition, fertilization and embryo development rates also decreased after exposure to CPAs (35.3 +/- 16.65%, 22.6 +/- 3.05%, respectively) and vitrification (32.3 +/- 9.29%, 20 +/- 1%, respectively). It was also found that fertilization and embryo development rates in granulose-intact oocytes were significantly higher compared to denuded oocytes in the control groups. However, a decline in embryo development to the blastocyst stage was observed after CPAs exposure (1.66 +/- 0.57%) or vitrification (2 +/- 1%) compared to control (22.3 +/- 2.51%). This could be attributed to the reduction in both cell types viability, and the generation of DNA damage in the cumulus cells. Conclusion This study demonstrates that oocyte exposure to CPAs or vitrification reduced viability in oocytes and cumulus cells, and generated DNA damage in the cumulus cells, affecting fertilization and embryo development rates. These findings will allow to understand some of the mechanisms of oocyte damage after vitrification that compromise their developmental capacity, as well as the search for new vitrification strategies to increase fertilization and embryo development rates by preserving the integrity of the cumulus cells.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文