Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers

被引:75
|
作者
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
Inciardi, Marc F. [2 ]
Edwards, Alexandra [1 ]
Papaioannou, John [1 ]
Drukker, Karen [1 ]
Jiang, Yulei [1 ]
Brem, Rachel [3 ]
Brown, Jeremy Bancroft [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, 5841 S Maryland Ave,MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
breast imaging; screening; ultrasound; whole-breast ultrasound; RISK; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; MULTIREADER; POPULATION; MORTALITY; ROC; US;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.15367
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to assess and compare, in a reader study, radiologists' performance in the detection of breast cancer using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone and using FFDM with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this multireader, multicase, sequential-design reader study, 17 Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified radiologists interpreted a cancer-enriched set of FFDM and ABUS examinations. All imaging studies were of asymptomatic women with BI-RADS C or D breast density. Readers first interpreted FFDM alone and subsequently interpreted FFDM combined with ABUS. The analysis included 185 cases: 133 noncancers and 52 biopsy-proven cancers. Of the 52 cancer cases, the screening FFDM images were interpreted as showing BI-RADS 1 or 2 findings in 31 cases and BI-RADS 0 findings in 21 cases. For the cases interpreted as BI-RADS 0, a forced BI-RADS score was also given. Reader performance was compared in terms of AUC under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS. The AUC was 0.72 for FFDM alone and 0.82 for FFDM combined with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant 14% relative improvement in AUC (i.e., change in AUC = 0.10 [95% CI, 0.07-0.14]; p < 0.001). When a cutpoint of BI-RADS 3 was used, the sensitivity across all readers was 57.5% for FFDM alone and 74.1% for FFDM with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant increase in sensitivity (p < 0.001) (relative increase = 29%). Overall specificity was 78.1% for FFDM alone and 76.1% for FFDM with ABUS (p = 0.496). For only the mammography-negative cancers, the average AUC was 0.60 for FFDM alone and 0.75 for FFDM with ABUS, yielding a statistically significant 25% relative improvement in AUC with the addition of ABUS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Combining mammography with ABUS, compared with mammography alone, significantly improved readers' detection of breast cancers in women with dense breast tissue without substantially affecting specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1350
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computerized Detection of Breast Cancer On Automated Breast Ultrasound for Women with Dense Breasts
    Drukker, K.
    Sennett, C.
    Giger, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [22] Ultrasound and mammography for breast cancer screening
    Magee, B. Dale
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (13): : 1514 - 1514
  • [23] Serum Thioredoxin 1 Enhances Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography and Breast Ultrasound, Including Dense Breasts
    Kim, Young
    Ko, Hyemi
    Lee, Yeri
    Shin, Keunkoo
    Song, Jongam
    Kim, Jeryoung
    Suh, Kyounghoon
    Lee, Jinsun
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [24] Automated breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening of mammographically dense breasts: added values
    Gouda, Walaa
    Yasin, Rabab
    Yasin, Mohamed Ibrahim
    Omar, Suzan
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01):
  • [25] Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts
    Drukker, Karen
    Sennett, Charlene A.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (01)
  • [26] The Addition of Automated Breast Ultrasound to Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening Decreases Stage at Diagnosis
    Grady, Ian
    Chanisheva, Nailya
    Vasquez, Tony
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 1570 - 1574
  • [27] Screening Breast Ultrasound Using Handheld or Automated Technique in Women with Dense Breasts
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Vourtsis, Athina
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2019, 1 (04) : 283 - 296
  • [28] Ultrasound and mammography for breast cancer screening - Reply
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (13): : 1515 - 1515
  • [29] Breast cancer screening by palpation, ultrasound, and mammography
    Morikubo, H
    RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN BREAST ULTRASOUND, 2005, : 159 - 162
  • [30] Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Dickman, Paul
    Leifland, Karin
    Saracco, Ariel
    Hall, Per
    Celebioglu, Fuat
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (05) : 515 - 520