A long-term conditional survival analysis for gastric cancer based on 7th and 8th TNM classification in Eastern and Western populations

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Ping [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Xie, Jian-Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jia-Bin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, Jian-Xian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lu, Jun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cao, Long-Long [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Mi [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Ru-Hong [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Gastr Surg, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Key Lab, Minist Educ Gastrointestinal Canc, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Key Lab Tumor Microbiol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
来源
EJSO | 2018年 / 44卷 / 12期
关键词
Conditional; Survival; Cancer; Eastern; Western; TNM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.064
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To compare the power to predict the 5-year conditional disease-specific survival (CS5) between the 7th and 8th editions of the TNM for gastric cancer (GC) patients. Method: This retrospective study recruited 20,548 patients who underwent GC surgery from the databases of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results and a center in Asia. The CS5 was evaluated with the 7th and 8th TNM classification. Results: A two-step model showed that at the 3-5th postoperative years, the 8th staging remained an independent risk factor, whereas there was no significant difference for 7th-edition staging. Further analysis of the ability to predict CS5 indicated that there were significant differences in the CS5 of 7th-edition stages Ilb and Ilia at baseline and at the postoperative 1-4th years (all p < 0.05, Cohen's d > 0.5). However, the CS5 of the fifth year was similar between them (p = 0.307, Cohen's d = 0.35). Meanwhile, the results indicated that the 8th-edition staging could effectively determine the CS5 among stages la, lb, Ila, Ilb, Illa, and Illb at baseline and at the postoperative 1-5th years (all p < 0.05). However, neither the 7th - nor the 8th-edition staging could predict the CS5 for stages Illb and Illc from the postoperative third to fifth years (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: For patients with stages IIB and ILIA GC, the 8th TNM has a higher discriminatory value than the 7th edition for CS5 after the postoperative fourth year. However, a more detailed classification system is still needed to predict conditional survival for GC. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1954
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging systems for lung cancer in a large North American cohort
    Yang, Lin
    Wang, Shidan
    Zhou, Yunyun
    Lai, Sunny
    Xiao, Guanghua
    Gazdar, Adi
    Xie, Yang
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (40) : 66784 - 66795
  • [42] EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF 7TH AND 8TH EDITIONS OF THE AJCC TNM STAGING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ANAL CANAL CANCER: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE STUDY
    Wang, Michael
    Doll, Corinne
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Fairchild, Alysa
    Usmani, Nawaid
    Tankel, Keith
    Nijjar, Tirath
    Severin, Diane
    Mulder, Karen
    Urgoiti, Gloria Roldan
    Mathen, Peter
    Joseph, Kurian
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 : S60 - S60
  • [43] A single-institution retrospective analysis of the differences between 7th and 8th edition of the UICC TNM staging system in patients with advanced lung cancer
    Grzywa-Celinska, A.
    Krusinski, A.
    Szewczyk, K.
    Grzycka-Kowalczyk, L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 24 (16) : 8394 - 8401
  • [44] A Proposal for Future Modifications on Clinical TNM Staging System of Retinoblastoma Based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 7th and 8th Editions
    Yousef, Yacoub A.
    Qaddoumi, Ibrahim
    Al-Nawaiseh, Ibrahim
    Mohammad, Mona
    AlRimawi, Dalia
    Toro, Mario Damiano
    Zweifel, Sandrine
    Rejdak, Robert
    Nazzal, Rashed
    Mehyar, Mustafa
    Jaradat, Imad
    Sultan, Iyad
    Al-Hussaini, Maysa
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 13 (04): : 1336 - 1345
  • [45] A Single Institution Study to Compare the 7th and 8th Editions of the AJCC TNM Classification of Lung Tumors in Typical and Atypical Carcinoid Tumors of the Lung
    Dermawan, Josephine
    Farver, Carol
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 729 - 729
  • [46] A Single Institution Study to Compare the 7th and 8th Editions of the AJCC TNM Classification of Lung Tumors in Typical and Atypical Carcinoid Tumors of the Lung
    Dermawan, Josephine
    Farver, Carol
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 729 - 729
  • [47] Comparison of 8th and 7th editions of TNM staging in terms of mortality, persistent disease, and response to treatment in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
    Gholami, Golnaz
    Aghaee, Atena
    Shafiei, Susan
    Rasoulian, Bashir
    Askari, Emran
    Namdar, Samira Zare
    Zakavi, Seyed Rasoul
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 63 (06): : 359 - 368
  • [48] Comparisons of remnant primary, residual, and recurrent gastric cancer and applicability of the 8th AJCC TNM classification for remnant gastric cancer staging
    Oh, Sung Eun
    An, Ji Yeong
    Choi, Min-Gew
    Lee, Jun Ho
    Sohn, Tae Sung
    Bae, Jae Moon
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (12): : 2236 - 2242
  • [49] The impact of radioactive iodine treatment on survival among papillary thyroid cancer patients according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC/TNM staging system: a SEER-based study
    Xiangxiang Liu
    Yaguang Fan
    Yuanchao Liu
    Xianghui He
    Xiangqian Zheng
    Jian Tan
    Qiang Jia
    Zhaowei Meng
    Updates in Surgery, 2020, 72 : 871 - 884
  • [50] The impact of radioactive iodine treatment on survival among papillary thyroid cancer patients according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC/TNM staging system: a SEER-based study
    Liu, Xiangxiang
    Fan, Yaguang
    Liu, Yuanchao
    He, Xianghui
    Zheng, Xiangqian
    Tan, Jian
    Jia, Qiang
    Meng, Zhaowei
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (03) : 871 - 884