For a misbehaved history: Michel Foucault's antidisciplinary historiography

This article analyzes the main contributions of Michel Foucault to the formulation of another possible history, aiming to map central aspects in the author's historiography that tension projects of a historiography still thought in terms of a science of man in time and epistemologically loyal to Enlightenment humanism. For that, we discuss some central concepts and categories proposed by Foucault that rearticulate the proposal of a historical archeogenealogy based on two movements: 1. the articulations between history, subject, and truth; and 2. the relationships between event, document, and file as effects of the subject's archeogenealogical strategy. The text will unravel the reconversion of the concepts of history, historical subject, truth, event, and document/archive as the effects of a methodological strategy directly opposed to the subject of Western reason.