Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment

被引:121
|
作者
Janin, Joel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Sud, IBBMC UMR 8619, F-91405 Orsay, France
关键词
SMALL-MOLECULE INHIBITORS; SHAPE COMPLEMENTARITY; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; ENERGY LANDSCAPE; SCORING FUNCTION; SOFT DOCKING; WEB SERVER; REFINEMENT; COMPLEX; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1039/c005060c
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Docking algorithms build multimolecular assemblies based on the subunit structures. "Unbound'' docking, which starts with the free molecules and allows for conformation changes, may be used to predict the structure of a protein-protein complex. This requires at least two steps, a rigid-body search that determines the relative position and orientation of the subunits, and a refinement step. The methods developed in the past twenty years yield native-like models in most cases, but always with many false positives that must be filtered out, and they fail when the conformation changes are large. CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions) is a community-wide experiment set up to monitor progress in the field. It offers participants the opportunity to test their methods in blind predictions that are assessed against an unpublished experimental structure. The models submitted by predictor groups are judged depending on how well they reproduce the geometry and the residue-residue contacts seen in the target structure. In nine years of CAPRI, 42 target complexes have been subjected to prediction based on the components' unbound structures. Good models have been submitted for 28 targets, and prediction has failed on 6. Both these successes and these failures have been fruitful, as they stimulated participant groups to develop new score functions to identify native-like solutions, and new algorithms that allow the molecules to be flexible during docking.
引用
收藏
页码:2351 / 2362
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protein-protein docking with rosettadock.
    Gray, JJ
    Baker, D
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 227 : U220 - U221
  • [32] Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking
    Kuroda, Daisuke
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    STRUCTURE, 2016, 24 (10) : 1821 - 1829
  • [33] Progress in protein-protein docking approaches
    Li Chun-Hua
    Ma Xiao-Hui
    Chen Wei-Zu
    Wang Cun-Xin
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2006, 33 (07) : 616 - 621
  • [34] Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis by Docking
    Fink, Florian
    Ederer, Stephan
    Gronwald, Wolfram
    ALGORITHMS, 2009, 2 (01): : 429 - 436
  • [35] Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking
    Berchanski, A
    Shapira, B
    Eisenstein, M
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 56 (01) : 130 - 142
  • [36] Interolog interfaces in protein-protein docking
    Alsop, James D.
    Mitchell, Julie C.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 83 (11) : 1940 - 1946
  • [37] Computer Vision for Protein-protein Docking
    Rudden, Lucas S. P.
    Degiacomi, Matteo T.
    Willcocks, Chris G.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 305A - 306A
  • [38] Protein-Protein Docking Dealing With the Unknown
    Moreira, Irina S.
    Fernandes, Pedro A.
    Ramos, Maria J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 31 (02) : 317 - 342
  • [39] Principles of flexible protein-protein docking
    Andrusier, Nelly
    Mashiach, Efrat
    Nussinov, Ruth
    Wolfson, Haim J.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (02) : 271 - 289
  • [40] Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility
    Wang, Chu
    Bradley, Philip
    Baker, David
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2007, 373 (02) : 503 - 519