The Choice Modelling approach to environmental valuation

被引:0
|
作者
Hanley, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 290
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Attribute causality in environmental choice modelling
    Blamey, RK
    Bennett, JW
    Louviere, JJ
    Morrison, MD
    Rolfe, JC
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 23 (02): : 167 - 186
  • [22] Attribute Causality in Environmental Choice Modelling
    R.K. Blamey
    J.W. Bennett
    J.J. Louviere
    M.D. Morrison
    J.C. Rolfe
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23 : 167 - 186
  • [23] Valuation of environmental improvements in a specially protected marine area: A choice experiment approach in Gocek Bay, Turkey
    Can, Ozge
    Alp, Emre
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 439 : 291 - 298
  • [24] Test-Retest Reliability of Choice Experiments in Environmental Valuation
    Liebe, Ulf
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    Hartje, Volkmar
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (03): : 389 - 407
  • [25] Social desirability bias in the environmental economic valuation: An inferred valuation approach
    Lopez-Becerra, E. I.
    Alcon, F.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 184
  • [26] A randomized response approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation
    Berrens, RP
    Bohara, AK
    Kerkvliet, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (01) : 252 - 266
  • [28] Application of choice modelling on mangrove forest valuation in West Lombok, Indonesia
    Saptutyningsih, Endah
    Diswandi, Diswandi
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT SCIENCES, 2019, 398
  • [29] Environmental Cost of Groundwater: A contingent Valuation Approach
    Martinez-Paz, J. M.
    Perni, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (03) : 603 - 612
  • [30] A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions
    Mogas, J
    Riera, P
    Bennett, J
    JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2006, 12 (01) : 5 - 30