Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

被引:46
|
作者
Sastre, Joaquin [1 ]
Mullol, Joaquim [2 ]
Valero, Antonio [3 ]
Valiente, Roman [4 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, Dept Allergy, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Unitat Rinol & Clin Olfacte, Serv Otorinolaringol Immunoallergia Resp Clin & E, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Unitat Allergia, Serv Pneumol & Allergia Resp,ICT, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Faes Farma SA, Dept Clin Res, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
Bilastine; Cetirizine; H-1; antihistamine; PAR; Perennial allergic rhinitis; DOUBLE-BLIND; LEVOCETIRIZINE;
D O I
10.1185/03007995.2011.640667
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Bilastine is a non-sedating second-generation H-1 antihistamine with proven efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of bilastine in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with symptomatic PAR (n = 650) from Argentina, Europe, and South Africa received bilastine 20 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, or placebo once daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean area under the curve (AUC) of reflective total 6-symptom scores (rT6SS) from baseline visit to day 28 (D28). Secondary outcome measures included mean AUC of instantaneous total 6-symptom scores (iT6SS), and mean AUCs of reflective and instantaneous total 4-nasal symptom scores (T4NSS) and total 2-ocular symptom scores (T2OSS) from baseline to D28. An open-label extension phase evaluated the safety of bilastine 20 mg administered to patients (n = 513) for one year. Results: In the overall population no significant differences in efficacy outcomes were found between active treatments and placebo. On account of the high placebo response in South Africa, a post-hoc analysis was conducted. This analysis demonstrated that statistically significant differences existed between active treatments and placebo in the mean AUC of rT6SS (p<0.05) and T4NSS (p<0.02), respectively, from baseline to D28 visit for the intent-to-treat population in patients from Europe and Argentina, whereas the difference was not statistically significant in South Africa. Whether this is related to differences in the demographic or clinical characteristics of South African patients (they had PAR for longer and reported more severe symptoms) and/or the disease management process compared with their European and Argentinean counterparts warrants further investigation. Conclusions: A post-hoc analysis indicated that bilastine and cetirizine were similarly effective and more effective than placebo during a 4-week treatment period in patients with PAR. In addition, bilastine was shown to be safe and well-tolerated over a 1-year treatment period.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 130
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Consistency and efficacy of cetirizine (10 mg) versus ebastine (20 mg) at 4 h on skin reactivity
    Purohit, A
    Duvernelle, C
    Melac, M
    Benabdesselam, O
    Pauli, G
    Frossard, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 55 (08) : 589 - 592
  • [42] SAFETY AND CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF BILASTINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS IN CHILDREN
    Bogomolov, A. Ye.
    Zaikov, S. V.
    Kulyk, L. G.
    Plykanchuk, O. V.
    WORLD OF MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 81 (03): : 31 - 34
  • [43] Efficacy of loratadine compared with fexofenadine or placebo for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Kaiser, HB
    Rooklin, A
    Spangler, D
    Capano, D
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2001, 21 (08) : 571 - 578
  • [44] Efficacy of Loratadine Compared with Fexofenadine or Placebo for the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
    Harold B. Kaiser
    Anthony Rooklin
    Dennis Spangler
    David Capano
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2001, 21 : 571 - 578
  • [45] Double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride (120 and 180 mg once daily) and cetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Howarth, PH
    Stern, MA
    Roi, L
    Reynolds, R
    Bousquet, J
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 104 (05) : 927 - 933
  • [46] EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LORATADINE IN PERENNIAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS
    BRUTTMANN, G
    CHARPIN, D
    GERMOUTY, J
    HORAK, F
    KUNKEL, G
    WITTMANN, G
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 83 (02) : 411 - 416
  • [47] Clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of ebastine 10 or 20mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in the US
    Storms, WW
    DRUGS, 1996, 52 : 20 - 25
  • [48] Efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg and 10/40 mg compared to atorvastatin 20 mg in type 2 diabetic patients
    Constance, C.
    Westphal, S.
    Chung, N.
    Lund, M.
    JohnsonLevonas, A.
    Massaad, R.
    Allen, C.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 : 453 - 454
  • [49] A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg once daily given with and without food in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Hampel, F
    Gillen, M
    Rohatagi, SS
    Lim, J
    Georges, G
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 42 (10): : 1097 - 1104
  • [50] Efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg and 10/40 mg compared to atorvastatin 20 mg in type 2 diabetic patients
    Constance, Christian
    Westphal, Sabine
    Chung, Namsik
    Lund, Margaret
    Johnson-Levonas, Amy
    Massaad, Rachid
    Allen, Christopher
    DIABETES, 2006, 55 : A522 - A522