Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

被引:46
|
作者
Sastre, Joaquin [1 ]
Mullol, Joaquim [2 ]
Valero, Antonio [3 ]
Valiente, Roman [4 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, Dept Allergy, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Unitat Rinol & Clin Olfacte, Serv Otorinolaringol Immunoallergia Resp Clin & E, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Clin Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Unitat Allergia, Serv Pneumol & Allergia Resp,ICT, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Faes Farma SA, Dept Clin Res, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
Bilastine; Cetirizine; H-1; antihistamine; PAR; Perennial allergic rhinitis; DOUBLE-BLIND; LEVOCETIRIZINE;
D O I
10.1185/03007995.2011.640667
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Bilastine is a non-sedating second-generation H-1 antihistamine with proven efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of bilastine in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with symptomatic PAR (n = 650) from Argentina, Europe, and South Africa received bilastine 20 mg, cetirizine 10 mg, or placebo once daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean area under the curve (AUC) of reflective total 6-symptom scores (rT6SS) from baseline visit to day 28 (D28). Secondary outcome measures included mean AUC of instantaneous total 6-symptom scores (iT6SS), and mean AUCs of reflective and instantaneous total 4-nasal symptom scores (T4NSS) and total 2-ocular symptom scores (T2OSS) from baseline to D28. An open-label extension phase evaluated the safety of bilastine 20 mg administered to patients (n = 513) for one year. Results: In the overall population no significant differences in efficacy outcomes were found between active treatments and placebo. On account of the high placebo response in South Africa, a post-hoc analysis was conducted. This analysis demonstrated that statistically significant differences existed between active treatments and placebo in the mean AUC of rT6SS (p<0.05) and T4NSS (p<0.02), respectively, from baseline to D28 visit for the intent-to-treat population in patients from Europe and Argentina, whereas the difference was not statistically significant in South Africa. Whether this is related to differences in the demographic or clinical characteristics of South African patients (they had PAR for longer and reported more severe symptoms) and/or the disease management process compared with their European and Argentinean counterparts warrants further investigation. Conclusions: A post-hoc analysis indicated that bilastine and cetirizine were similarly effective and more effective than placebo during a 4-week treatment period in patients with PAR. In addition, bilastine was shown to be safe and well-tolerated over a 1-year treatment period.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 130
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study
    Kuna, P.
    Bachert, C.
    Nowacki, Z.
    van Cauwenberge, P.
    Agache, I.
    Fouquert, L.
    Roger, A.
    Sologuren, A.
    Valiente, R.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (09): : 1338 - 1347
  • [2] Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg versus Fexofenadine 180 mg for Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: Randomized Controlled Study
    Singhal, Aditya
    Agrawal, Pooja
    Chatterji, Probal
    Matreja, Pritpal Singh
    Mahmood, Tariq
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 76 (05) : 4025 - 4030
  • [3] Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine ( 10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg in perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Marmouz, Farid
    Giralt, Josep
    Izquierdo, Inaki
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY, 2011, 4 : 27 - 35
  • [4] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients
    Bachert, C.
    Kuna, P.
    Sanquer, F.
    Ivan, P.
    Dimitrov, V.
    Gorina, M. M.
    van de Heyning, P.
    Loureiro, A.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 (01) : 158 - 165
  • [5] Meta-analysis of the efficacy of ebastine 20 mg compared to loratadine 10 mg and placebo in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Ratner, P
    Falqués, M
    Chuecos, F
    Esbrí, R
    Gispert, J
    Peris, F
    Luria, X
    Rosales, MJ
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 138 (04) : 312 - 318
  • [6] Higher efficacy of rupatadine 20 mg and 10 mg versus placebo in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pooled responder analysis
    Valero, Antonio
    Izquierdo, Inaki
    Kowalski, Marek L.
    Scadding, Glenis K.
    Bousquet, Jean
    Mullol, Joaquim
    ALLERGY ASTHMA AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [7] Higher efficacy of rupatadine 20 mg and 10 mg versus placebo in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pooled responder analysis
    Antonio Valero
    Iñaki Izquierdo
    Marek L. Kowalski
    Glenis K. Scadding
    Jean Bousquet
    Joaquim Mullol
    Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, 16
  • [8] MULTICENTER, CROSSOVER STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF TERFENADINE, 120 MG, VERSUS CETIRIZINE, 10 MG, IN PERENNIAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS
    RENTON, R
    FIDLER, C
    ROSENBERG, R
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1991, 67 (04): : 416 - 420
  • [9] The comparison of the efficacy and safety of cetirizine, oxatomide, ketotifen, and a placebo for the treatment of childhood perennial allergic rhinitis
    Lai, DS
    Lue, KH
    Hsieh, JC
    Lin, KL
    Lee, HS
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 89 (06) : 589 - 598
  • [10] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CETIRIZINE THERAPY IN PERENNIAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS
    MANSMANN, HC
    ALTMAN, RA
    BERMAN, BA
    BUCHMAN, E
    DOCKHORN, RJ
    LEESE, PT
    LOVE, SJ
    MIDDLETON, E
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1992, 68 (04): : 348 - 353