A pilot quality-of-life instrument for pruritus

被引:158
|
作者
Desai, Nisha S. [3 ]
Poindexter, Gabriele B. [2 ]
Monthrope, Yvette Miller [4 ]
Bendeck, Sandra E. [5 ]
Swerlick, Robert A. [1 ,6 ]
Chen, Suephy C. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[6] Atlanta Vet Adm Med Ctr, Div Dermatol, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Atlanta Vet Adm Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2008.04.006
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective. We sought to develop a validated, reliable pruritus-specific quality-of-life (QOL) instrument, ItchyQoL. Methods: From 21 in-depth interviews with patients with pruritus, we developed 22 pruritus-specific items, and hypothesized 3 major constructs that explain the way pruritus affects patients' QOL: symptoms, functional limitations, and emotions. We developed two versions of the pruritus QOL instrument, which assess for level of bother or frequency using items from the interviews and from generic skin QOL instruments, Skindex-16 (bother) and Skindex-29 (frequency). The instrument was tested for validity, reliability, and responsiveness. The frequency version was subsequently applied clinically to further evaluate its face validity. Results: A total of 89 patients with dermatologic conditions participated in the validation phase and 101 patients participated in the clinical application phase of the study. Construct validity was demonstrated by principal axes factor analyses and by demonstrating that differences in symptoms, functioning, and emotion differed among the varying levels of self-reported pruritius severity more than would be expected by chance (P < .05 by analysis of variance). The instrument demonstrated reliability with internal consistency (Cronbach alpha: frequency 0.72-0.93 and bother 0.78-0.81) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient: frequency 0.91 and bother 0.84-0.87). The instrument suggested preliminary responsiveness for patients with improved disease for both frequency and bother items with both overall scores and the majority of the subscales scored demonstrating significant changes. Discriminant validity was shown by comparing differences in and the number of insensitive items between the pruritus-specific QOL instrument and the generic Skindex instruments. Limitations: Lack of generalizability and potential selection bias are limitations. Conclusions: This study represents, to our knowledge, the first attempt at a pruritus-specific QOL instrument that is reliable, valid, and responsive.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 244
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Validation of a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Infantile Hemangiomas
    Chamlin, Sarah L.
    Mancini, Anthony J.
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    Beaumont, Jennifer L.
    Cella, David
    Adams, Denise
    Drolet, Beth
    Baselga, Eulalia
    Frieden, Ilona J.
    Garzon, Maria
    Holland, Kristin
    Horii, Kimberly A.
    Lucky, Anne W.
    McCuaig, Catherine
    Metry, Denise
    Morel, Kimberly D.
    Newell, Brandon D.
    Nopper, Amy J.
    Powell, Julie
    Siegel, Dawn
    Haggstrom, Anita N.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 135 (06) : 1533 - 1539
  • [22] Validation of a Disease-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument for Acoustic Neuroma: The Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale
    Shaffer, Brian T.
    Cohen, Michael S.
    Bigelow, Douglas C.
    Ruckenstein, Michael J.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2010, 120 (08): : 1646 - 1654
  • [23] Validating Responsiveness of a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Allergic Contact Dermatitis
    Raffi, Jodie
    Elaine Allen, Isabel
    Botto, Nina
    DERMATITIS, 2020, 31 (03) : 209 - 214
  • [24] QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PWAS - EVALUATION BY THE MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY INSTRUMENT
    RIZZI, M
    MARCHESI, S
    MORELLI, E
    AVOGADRI, M
    AIDS PATIENT CARE, 1994, 8 (05): : 265 - 268
  • [25] OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - CHOOSING THE RIGHT INSTRUMENT
    ERICKSON, P
    TAEUBER, RC
    SCOTT, J
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 7 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [26] DEVELOPMENT OF THE KIDNEY-DISEASE QUALITY-OF-LIFE (KDQOL) INSTRUMENT
    KALLICH, J
    MAPES, D
    CARTER, W
    COONS, S
    HAYS, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1994, 5 (03): : 333 - 333
  • [27] QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN EPILEPSY - QOLIE-89 INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT
    DEVINSKY, O
    VICKREY, B
    HAYS, R
    PERRINE, K
    HERMANN, B
    MEADER, K
    CRAMER, J
    NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (04) : A141 - A141
  • [28] Validation of a quality-of-life instrument for patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer
    Rhee, John S.
    Matthews, B. Alex
    Neuburg, Marcy
    Logan, Brent R.
    Burzynski, Mary
    Nattinger, Ann B.
    ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 8 (05) : 314 - 318
  • [29] German ItchyQoL: a novel instrument to assess pruritus-specific quality of life
    Krause, K.
    Kessler, B.
    Maurer, M.
    Metz, M.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 19 (02) : 196 - 196
  • [30] German ItchyQoL: a novel instrument to assess pruritus-specific quality of life
    Krause, K.
    Kessler, B.
    Metz, M.
    Maurer, M.
    ALLERGY, 2010, 65 : 703 - 703