Factors Predictive of Re-excision After Oncoplastic Breast-conserving Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Amabile, Maria-Ida [1 ]
Mazouni, Chafika [1 ]
Guimond, Cathie [1 ]
Sarfati, Benjamin [1 ]
Leymarie, Nicolas [1 ]
Cloutier, Alexis-Simon [1 ]
Bentivegna, Enrica [1 ]
Garbay, Jean-Remi [1 ]
Kolb, Frederic [1 ]
Rimareix, Francoise [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Gustave Roussy, Dept Surg, Div Breast Surg Plast & Reconstruct Surg, F-94805 Villejuif, France
关键词
Breast cancer; mammoplasty; mastectomy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery; LOCAL RECURRENCE; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY; CONSERVATION THERAPY; LUMPECTOMY MARGINS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CANCER; MASTECTOMY; DOCETAXEL; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) consists of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) that allows for oncologically safe breast conservation and breast remodeling, thus reducing postoperative deformities. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors determining the risk of re-excision and complications after OPS. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent OPS between 2009 and 2013, regardless of whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered. Clinical and pathological factors were evaluated. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to build regression trees for the prediction of re-excision. Results: Amongst the 129 patients treated by OPS procedures, 30.3% required re-excision. Predictive factors for re-excision were: being overweight (p=0.02), the presence of microcalcifications on mammography (p=0.003), and tumor multifocality (p=0.03). The RPA identified five terminal nodes based on microcalcifications on mammography, being overweight and the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ. Another model included minimal invasive margins (p<0.001), being overweight (p=0.02) and the presence of microcalcifications (p=0.01) on mammography yielded a model with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875. Conclusion: Microcalcifications, tumor multifocality and being overweight were the factors identified as predictors of re-excision after OPS. These factors can serve as decisional tools before surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:4229 / 4234
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Margin Width Is Not Predictive of Residual Disease on Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Gusic, Lejla Hadzikadic
    McGuire, Kandace
    Ozmen, Tolga
    Thomas, Christine
    Soran, Atilla
    McAuliffe, Priscilla
    Diego, Emilia
    Bonaventura, Marguerite
    Johnson, Ronald
    Ahrendt, Gretchen
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 : 52 - 54
  • [22] Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast-conserving therapy
    O'Brien, Julie
    Morrow, Monica
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (06) : 507 - 508
  • [23] Does Mammographic Density Impact the Rate of Margin Re-excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Edwards, Brandy L.
    Guidry, Christopher
    Larson, Krista
    Novicoff, Wendy
    Harvey, Jennifer
    Schroen, Anneke
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 : 45 - 46
  • [24] Close or positive margins in breast-conserving surgery: is re-excision always necessary?
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2006, 3 (10): : 529 - 530
  • [25] Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer
    Waljee, Jennifer F.
    Hu, Emily S.
    Newman, Lisa A.
    Alderman, Amy K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (05) : 1297 - 1303
  • [26] The impact of intraoperative cavity shaving on re-excision rates in breast-conserving surgery
    Ilhan, Burak
    Bademler, Suleyman
    Kilic, Berkay
    Onder, Semen
    Karanlik, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 127 (04) : 527 - 534
  • [27] A Statewide Approach to Reducing Re-excision Rates for Women With Breast-conserving Surgery
    Schumacher, Jessica R.
    Lawson, Elise H.
    Kong, Amanda L.
    Weber, Joseph J.
    May, Jeanette
    Landercasper, Jeffrey
    Hanlon, Bret
    Marka, Nicholas
    Venkatesh, Manasa
    Cartmill, Randi S.
    Pavuluri Quamme, Sudha
    Nikolay, Connor
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 276 (04) : 665 - 672
  • [28] Should Re-excision Lumpectomy Rates Be a Quality Measure in Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Schwartz, Theresa
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Landercasper, Jeffrey
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (10) : 3180 - 3183
  • [29] Predictors of Re-excision among Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer
    Jennifer F. Waljee
    Emily S. Hu
    Lisa A. Newman
    Amy K. Alderman
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15
  • [30] Patient-level costs in margin re-excision for breast-conserving surgery
    Grant, Y.
    Al-Khudairi, R.
    St John, E.
    Barschkett, M.
    Cunningham, D.
    Al-Mufti, R.
    Hogben, K.
    Thiruchelvam, P.
    Hadjiminas, D. J.
    Darzi, A.
    Carter, A. W.
    Leff, D. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (04) : 384 - 394