Speech Situation Checklist-Revised: Investigation With Adults Who Do Not Stutter and Treatment-Seeking Adults Who Stutter

被引:23
|
作者
Vanryckeghem, Martine [1 ]
Matthews, Michael [1 ]
Xu, Peixin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
SOCIAL ANXIETY; NONSTUTTERERS; ADOLESCENTS; VARIABILITY; PREDICTIONS; DISORDERS; FREQUENCY; RESPONSES; SPEAKERS; AROUSAL;
D O I
10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0170
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Speech Situation Checklist for adults who stutter (SSC) in differentiating people who stutter (PWS) from speakers with no stutter based on self-reports of anxiety and speech disruption in communicative settings. The SSC's psychometric properties were examined, norms were established, and suggestions for treatment were formulated. Method: The SSC was administered to 88 PWS seeking treatment and 209 speakers with no stutter between the ages of 18 and 62. The SSC consists of 2 sections investigating negative emotional reaction and speech disruption in 38 speech situations that are identical in both sections. Results: The SSG-Emotional Reaction and SSG-Speech Disruption data show that these self-report tests differentiate PWS from speakers with no stutter to a statistically significant extent and have great discriminative value. The tests have good internal reliability, content, and construct validity. Age and gender do not affect the scores of the PWS. Conclusions: The SSC-Emotional Reaction and SSC-Speech Disruption seem to be powerful measures to investigate negative emotion and speech breakdown in an array of speech situations. The item scores give direction to treatment by suggesting speech situations that need a clinician's attention in terms of generalization and carry-over of within-clinic therapeutic gains into in vivo settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1140
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating treatment outcomes for adults who stutter
    Yaruss, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2001, 34 (1-2) : 163 - 182
  • [22] Categorical perception of speech sounds in adults who stutter
    Bakhtiar, Mehdi
    Shao, Jing
    Cheung, Man Na
    Zhang, Caicai
    [J]. CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2021, 35 (06) : 560 - 576
  • [24] A comparative investigation of the speech-associated coping responses reported by adults who do and do not stutter
    Vanryckeghem, M
    Brutten, GJ
    Uddin, N
    Van Borsel, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2004, 29 (03) : 237 - 250
  • [25] Examining resting state functional connectivity and frequency power analysis in adults who stutter compared to adults who do not stutter
    Valaei, Atefeh
    Bamdad, Sobhan
    Golfam, Arsalan
    Golmohammadi, Golnoosh
    Ameri, Hayat
    Raoufy, Mohammad Reza
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [26] Monitoring of respiratory patterns and biosignals during speech from adults who stutter and do not stutter: A comparative analysis
    Villegas, Bruno
    Flores, Kevin M.
    Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
    Elias, Dante
    [J]. 2019 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ISMICT), 2019, : 146 - 150
  • [27] Uniqueness Point Effects during Speech Planning in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter
    Coalson, Geoffrey A.
    Byrd, Courtney T.
    Kuylen, Amanda
    [J]. FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2017, 69 (5-6) : 191 - 208
  • [28] Bimanual task performance: Adults who do and do not stutter
    Werle, Danielle
    Byrd, Courtney
    Gkalitsiou, Zoi
    Eggers, Kurt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2019, 81
  • [29] Speech and nonspeech sequence skill learning in adults who stutter
    Smits-Bandstra, Sarah
    De Nil, Luc F.
    Saint-Cyr, Jean A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2006, 31 (02) : 116 - 136
  • [30] Time estimation by adults who stutter
    Ezrati-Vinacour, R
    Levin, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2001, 44 (01): : 144 - 155