Speech Situation Checklist-Revised: Investigation With Adults Who Do Not Stutter and Treatment-Seeking Adults Who Stutter

被引:23
|
作者
Vanryckeghem, Martine [1 ]
Matthews, Michael [1 ]
Xu, Peixin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
SOCIAL ANXIETY; NONSTUTTERERS; ADOLESCENTS; VARIABILITY; PREDICTIONS; DISORDERS; FREQUENCY; RESPONSES; SPEAKERS; AROUSAL;
D O I
10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0170
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Speech Situation Checklist for adults who stutter (SSC) in differentiating people who stutter (PWS) from speakers with no stutter based on self-reports of anxiety and speech disruption in communicative settings. The SSC's psychometric properties were examined, norms were established, and suggestions for treatment were formulated. Method: The SSC was administered to 88 PWS seeking treatment and 209 speakers with no stutter between the ages of 18 and 62. The SSC consists of 2 sections investigating negative emotional reaction and speech disruption in 38 speech situations that are identical in both sections. Results: The SSG-Emotional Reaction and SSG-Speech Disruption data show that these self-report tests differentiate PWS from speakers with no stutter to a statistically significant extent and have great discriminative value. The tests have good internal reliability, content, and construct validity. Age and gender do not affect the scores of the PWS. Conclusions: The SSC-Emotional Reaction and SSC-Speech Disruption seem to be powerful measures to investigate negative emotion and speech breakdown in an array of speech situations. The item scores give direction to treatment by suggesting speech situations that need a clinician's attention in terms of generalization and carry-over of within-clinic therapeutic gains into in vivo settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1140
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adults who stutter do not stutter during private speech
    Jackson, Eric S.
    Miller, Lindsay R.
    Warner, Haley J.
    Yaruss, J. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2021, 70
  • [2] Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
    Ritto, Ana Paula
    Costa, Julia Biancalana
    Juste, Fabiola Starobole
    Furquim de Andrade, Claudia Regina
    [J]. CLINICS, 2016, 71 (03) : 152 - 155
  • [3] Online sentence processing in adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
    Bosshardt, HG
    Fransen, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (04): : 785 - 797
  • [4] Locus of control comparison in adults who stutter and who do not stutter
    Karsan, Cagdas
    Ozdemir, R. Sertan
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (22) : 18660 - 18669
  • [5] A speech and psychological profile of treatment-seeking adolescents who stutter
    Iverach, Lisa
    Lowe, Robyn
    Jones, Mark
    O'Brian, Susan
    Menzies, Ross G.
    Packman, Ann
    Onslow, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2017, 51 : 24 - 38
  • [6] Locus of control comparison in adults who stutter and who do not stutter
    Çağdaş Karsan
    R. Sertan Özdemir
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 18660 - 18669
  • [7] SPEECH PREPARATION IN ADULTS WHO STUTTER
    Mock, Jeffrey
    Foundas, Anne
    Golob, Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 47 - 47
  • [8] Safety Behaviors and Speech Treatment for Adults Who Stutter
    Helgadottir, Fjola Dogg
    Menzies, Ross G.
    Onslow, Mark
    Packman, Ann
    O'Brian, Sue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2014, 57 (04): : 1308 - 1313
  • [9] A fNIRS Investigation of Speech Planning and Execution in Adults Who Stutter
    Jackson, Eric S.
    Wijeakumar, Sobana
    Beal, Deryk S.
    Brown, Bryan
    Zebrowski, Patricia
    Spencer, John P.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 406 : 73 - 85
  • [10] Distributional properties of speech fluency in adults who do and do not stutter
    Felsenfeld, S
    Kubarych, T
    Martin, NG
    Neale, MC
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2005, 35 (06) : 799 - 799