Examining the association between short interpregnancy interval births and the type and timing of postpartum long acting reversible contraception

被引:8
|
作者
Rodriguez, Maria I. [1 ,2 ]
Skye, Megan [1 ]
Ramanadhan, Shaalini [1 ]
Schrote, Kaitlin [1 ]
Darney, Blair G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Ctr Hlth Syst Effectiveness, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, Portland, OR USA
[4] Natl Inst Publ Hlth INSP, Ctr Populat Hlth Res CISP, Cuernavaca, Mexico
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Interpregnancy intervals; LARC; Intrauterine device; Implant; Immediate postpartum contraception; DELIVERY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.12.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether the type (intrauterine device or implant) or timing (immediately post -partum vs interval) of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception was associated with a reduction in short interpregnancy interval births. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Medicaid claims and birth certifi-cate data from Oregon and South Carolina, 2010 to 2018. Our primary outcome was short interpregnancy interval, defined as repeat pregnancy within 18 months of the index delivery. We determined postpartum contraceptive method and timing of receipt. To assess the association of timing of long acting reversible contraception with short interpregnancy interval, we calculated adjusted probabilities from a logistic re-gression model incorporating covariate balanced propensity score weights, sociodemographic factors, and clustered at the woman-level. Results: Our study sample included 121,422 births to 97,084 individuals who had more than 1 birth during the study period; 41% had a short interpregnancy interval. A majority of individuals had not re-ceived any contraception by 6 months postpartum (68.6%). Overall, 15,477 individuals used long acting reversible contraception postpartum, with the majority receiving interval rather than immediate post -partum long acting reversible contraception (92.9% vs 7.1%). In multivariable analyses, both immediate postpartum (23.0%, 95% CI: 20.5%-25.8%) and interval long acting reversible contraception (15.2%, 95% CI: 14.4%-16.1%) are associated with a lower probability of short interpregnancy interval than short acting methods (42.1%, 95% CI: 41.2%-43.0%). Conclusion: Compared to short-acting methods, receipt of both immediate postpartum and interval long-acting reversible contraception is associated with lower probabilities of a subsequent short interpreg-nancy interval. Implications: All long acting, reversible contraception, whether placed immediately postpartum or on an interval basis, was associated with a significantly lower probability of a short interpregnancy interval than short acting or no contraceptive method. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Associations between immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception and short interpregnancy intervals
    Wu, Min
    Eisenberg, Ruth
    Negassa, Abdissa
    Levi, Erika
    CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (06) : 409 - 413
  • [2] Effects of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception on Short Interpregnancy Intervals
    Wu, Min
    Eisenberg, Ruth
    Negassa, Abdissa
    Levi, Erika
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 86S - 86S
  • [3] Association of Expanded Prenatal Care Coverage for Immigrant Women With Postpartum Contraception and Short Interpregnancy Interval Births
    Rodriguez, Maria, I
    Kaufman, Menolly
    Lindner, Stephan
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    DeFede, Ana Lopez
    McConnell, K. John
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2022, 77 (02) : 73 - 75
  • [4] Association of Expanded Prenatal Care Coverage for Immigrant Women With Postpartum Contraception and Short Interpregnancy Interval Births
    Rodriguez, Maria I.
    Kaufman, Menolly
    Lindner, Stephan
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    DeFede, Ana Lopez
    McConnell, K. John
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (08) : E2118912
  • [5] Impact of Immediate Postpartum Long Acting Reversible Contraception on Short Interval Pregnancy Rates
    Hess, Amanda K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 : 8S - 9S
  • [6] Medicaid and receipt of interval postpartum long-acting reversible contraception
    Wilkinson, Barbara
    Ascha, Mustafa
    Verbus, Emily
    Montague, Mary
    Morris, Jane
    Mercer, Brian
    Arora, Kavita Shah
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (01) : 32 - 35
  • [7] Postpartum contraception method type and risk of a short interpregnancy interval in a state Medicaid population
    Gifford, Katie
    McDuffie, Mary Joan
    Rashid, Hira
    Knight, Erin K.
    McColl, Rebecca
    Boudreaux, Michel
    Rendall, Michael S.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 104 (03) : 284 - 288
  • [8] Postpartum Contraception Acceptance and Readiness for Long Acting Reversible Contraception
    Williams, Heather
    Goad, Lindsay
    Treloar, MacKenzie
    Mejia, Rachel
    Stockdale, Colleen
    Hardy-Fairbanks, Abbey
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 102S - 103S
  • [9] IMMEDIATE VERSUS INTERVAL INITIATION OF LONG-ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION IN POSTPARTUM WOMEN
    Singh, R.
    Murata, E.
    Thaxton, L.
    Espey, E.
    Chungtuyco, M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (03) : 336 - 336
  • [10] Uptake of Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: The Impact of Timing and Practice Patterns
    Corbin, Kaitlin
    Miller, Hayley
    Bates, Paige
    Lerma, Klaira
    Noon, Brigit
    Shaw, Kate A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 110S - 110S