Homestead reduction, economic agglomeration and rural economic development: evidence from Shanghai, China

被引:11
|
作者
Liu, Hongmei [1 ]
Li, Guoxiang [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Keqiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Normal Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Normal Univ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Homestead reduction; Economic agglomeration; Rural economic development; Industrial integration; URBAN-RENEWAL; LAND CONSOLIDATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL LAND; INFRASTRUCTURE; POLICY; MODEL; PRODUCTIVITY; INVESTMENTS; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1108/CAER-02-2021-0035
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose The contradiction of construction land in economically developed regions is becoming more prominent, and the scale of construction land in some large cities is close to the ceiling. Therefore, China implemented the policy of construction land reduction in 2014. The main objective is to optimize the stock of homesteads and then help to realize rural revitalization by transferring land indexes across regions. Shanghai took the lead in implementing the reduction policy in 2014, for which reduction acceptance data are available. Thus, this paper evaluates the impact of homestead reduction on rural economic development based on data from towns in Shanghai. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the policy effects of homestead reduction on rural residents' income and industrial integration development. Using economic agglomeration (EA) as a mediating variable, the authors explore how homestead reduction (HR) promotes EA to drive rural economic development and analyze the impact of geographic location and government investment. Findings HR significantly promotes rural economic development and shows a significant cumulative effect. In the long run, HR can improve rural residents' income and promote industrial integration by promoting EA. The positive effect of HR and EA in suburban regions on industrial integration development is gradually increasing. However, the incentive effect on rural residents' income is weakening. The positive mediating effect of EA is significantly higher in regions with low government investment than in regions with high government investment. Originality/value This paper contributes to testing the impact of HR policy on rural economic development and can provide a reference for other regions aiming to implement reduction policy.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 293
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Skills, transport and economic development: evidence from a rural area in England
    Owen, David
    Hogarth, Terence
    Green, Anne E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 21 : 80 - 92
  • [42] Economic dependence of rural people on homestead forestry in Mymensingh, Bangladesh
    Nur Muhammed
    Md. Farhad Hossain Masum
    Md. Mohitul Hossain
    Sheeladitya Chakma
    Gerhard Oesten
    [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2013, 24 (03) : 591 - 597
  • [43] THE RURAL ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATIONS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS - EVIDENCE FROM PENNSYLVANIA
    CRONIN, FJ
    MCGOVERN, BM
    MILLER, MR
    PARKER, EB
    [J]. TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 1995, 19 (07) : 545 - 559
  • [44] How does industrial co-agglomeration affect high-quality economic development? Evidence from Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle in China
    Zheng, Huan
    He, Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [45] Influence evaluation of producer services agglomeration on economic resilience: Evidence from China's cities
    Du, Yanan
    Wang, Qingxi
    Hu, An
    Xin, Yueji
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [46] Does economic agglomeration affect the sustainable intensification of cultivated land use? Evidence from China
    Hou, Xianhui
    Yin, Yuqing
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhao, Minjuan
    Yao, Lan
    Zhang, Daojun
    Wang, Xiangdong
    Xia, Chuyu
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [47] “Green” economic development in China: quantile regression evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Maosheng Ye
    Wan Chen
    Ling Guo
    Yuqin Li
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 60572 - 60583
  • [48] "Green" economic development in China: quantile regression evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Ye, Maosheng
    Chen, Wan
    Guo, Ling
    Li, Yuqin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (40) : 60572 - 60583
  • [49] Public willingness to pay for environmental management, risk reduction and economic development: Evidence from Tianjin, China
    Zhai, Guofang
    Suzuki, Takeshi
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 19 (04) : 551 - 566
  • [50] Do economic development and population agglomeration inevitably aggravate haze pollution in China? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis
    Ting Gan
    Huachao Yang
    Wei Liang
    Xianchun Liao
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 5063 - 5079