Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty

被引:23
|
作者
Rubinstein, M [1 ]
Finelli, A [1 ]
Moinzadeh, A [1 ]
Singh, D [1 ]
Ukimura, O [1 ]
Desai, MM [1 ]
Kaouk, JH [1 ]
Gill, IS [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Sect Laparoscop & Robot Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.02.035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty aims to reproduce the excellent functional outcomes of open pyeloplasty while diminishing procedural morbidity. Methods. Six patients fulfilled specific inclusion criteria for outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty: informed consent, body mass index of 40 kg/m(2) or less, primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction, uncomplicated laparoscopic surgery completed by 12:00 Pm, and postoperative pain control by oral analgesics. All patients had a double-J ureteral stent placed cystoscopically before laparoscopic access. No drains were placed postoperatively. Results. All 6 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty (3 left, 3 right) using the retroperitoneal (n = 5) or transperitoneal (n = 1) approach. The average patient age was 22 years. The mean surgical time was 223 minutes (range 165 to 270), the mean blood loss was 82 mL (range 10 to 250), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 359 minutes (range 226 to 424). Postoperative analgesia comprised a mean of 6 mg morphine sulfate and 32 mg of ketorolac. No complications or readmissions occurred postoperatively. Intravenous urography and Lasix technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scans documented resolution of obstruction. With long-term follow-up (mean 38.4 months), no recurrences have developed. Conclusions. We report our initial series of ambulatory laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In this well-selected patient population, outpatient pyeloplasty was feasible and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 43
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty in children: comparison with laparoscopic primary pyeloplasty
    V. V. S. Chandrasekharam
    Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery, 2020, 2 (2) : 69 - 73
  • [12] SINGLE INCISION PYELOPLASTY - AS FEASIBLE AS LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY?
    Imkamp, F.
    Herrmann, T. R.
    Kuczyk, M. A.
    Nagele, U.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A387 - A388
  • [13] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children
    Ravish, I. R.
    Nerli, R. B.
    Reddy, Mallikarjun N.
    Amarkhed, Shrishailesh S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (08) : 897 - 902
  • [14] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A Versatile Alternative to Open Pyeloplasty
    Srivastava, Aneesh
    Singh, Pratipal
    Maheshwari, Ruchir
    Ansari, Mohd S.
    Dubey, Deepak
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Kumar, Anant
    Mandhani, Anil
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2009, 83 (04) : 420 - 424
  • [15] Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Rassweiler, Jens J.
    Teber, Dogu
    Frede, Thomas
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 26 (06) : 539 - 547
  • [16] Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyeloplasty
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [17] Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Chang, C. M.
    Gianduzzo, T.
    Eden, C. G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 : 15 - 15
  • [18] Robotic Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Chammas, Mario F., Jr.
    Mitre, Anuar I.
    Hubert, Nicolas
    Egrot, Christophe
    Hubert, Jacques
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (01) : 110 - 115
  • [19] Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Romero, Frederico R.
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Trapp, Claudemir
    Permpongkosol, Sompol
    Muntener, Michael
    Link, Richard E.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06): : 2526 - 2529
  • [20] Is outpatient robotic pyeloplasty feasible?
    Finkelstein J.B.
    Van Batavia J.P.
    Casale P.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2016, 10 (3) : 233 - 237