Systems model of construction accident causation

被引:235
|
作者
Mitropoulos, P [1 ]
Abdelhamid, TS
Howell, GA
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Del E Webb Sch Construct, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Construct Management Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Lean Construct Inst, Ketchum, ID 83340 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(816)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The current approach to safety focuses on prescribing and enforcing "defenses;" that is, physical and procedural barriers that reduce the workers' exposure to hazards. Under this perspective, accidents occur because the prescribed defenses are violated due to lack of safety knowledge and/or commitment. This perspective has a limited view of accident causality, as it ignores the work system factors and their interactions that generate the hazardous situations and shape the work behaviors. Understanding and addressing these causal factors that lead to accidents is necessary to develop effective accident prevention strategies. This paper presents a new accident causation model of the factors affecting the likelihood of accidents during a construction activity. The model takes a systems view of accidents-it focuses on how the characteristics of the production system generate hazardous situations and shape the work behaviors, and analyzes the conditions that trigger the release of the hazards. The model is based on descriptive rather than prescriptive models of work behaviors-it takes into account the actual production behaviors, as opposed to the normative behaviors and procedures that workers "should" follow. The model identifies the critical role of task unpredictability in generating unexpected hazardous situations, and acknowledges the inevitability of exposures and errors. The model identifies the need for two accident prevention strategies: (1) reliable production planning to reduce task unpredictability, and (2) error management to increase the workers' ability to avoid, trap, and mitigate errors. The new causation model contributes to safety research by increasing understanding of the production system factors that affect the frequency of accident. The practical benefit of the model is that it provides practitioners with strategies to reduce the likelihood of accidents.
引用
收藏
页码:816 / 825
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INVESTIGATING LINEAR MODELS OF ACCIDENT CAUSATION: A REVIEW STUDY IN THE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY CONTEXT
    Demirkesen, Sevilay
    SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2020, 38 (04): : 1939 - 1949
  • [22] Further Study of Accident Causation"2-4" Model
    Yin, Wentao
    Fu, Gui
    Zhu, Kai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION 2015, 2016, 30 : 1205 - 1209
  • [23] The Coal Mine Accident Causation Model Based on the Hazard Theory
    Liang, Kaiwu
    Liu, Jikun
    Wang, Cuixia
    ISMSSE 2011, 2011, 26
  • [24] Accident causation models: A comparison of SCM and 24Model
    Chen, Ping
    Fu, Gui
    Wang, Yi
    Meng, Han
    Lv, Mingkai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2023, 237 (04) : 810 - 822
  • [25] An accident causation model for the railway industry: Application of the model to 80 rail accident investigation reports from the UK
    Kim, Dong San
    Yoon, Wan Chul
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 60 : 57 - 68
  • [26] EMOTIONAL FACTORS AND ACCIDENT CAUSATION
    TREDGOLD, RF
    COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1970, 2 (01): : 7 - 11
  • [27] Contributions to the study of accident causation
    不详
    LANCET, 1922, 2 : 1296 - 1296
  • [28] THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF ACCIDENT CAUSATION
    COLE, WG
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1951, 6 (04): : 72 - 72
  • [29] CREW BEHAVIOR IN ACCIDENT CAUSATION
    YANOWITCH, RE
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1977, 48 (10): : 918 - 921
  • [30] Industry differences in accident causation
    Williamson, AM
    Feyer, AM
    Cairns, DR
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 1996, 24 (01) : 1 - 12